[REBOL] eGroups Rebol-List replacement list Re:(2)

2000-10-15 Thread rebol
If RT wants to close down their Selma based lists and migrate to a different service, I think they should a) create the lists they want to use; b) pipe the existing email addresses to the lists they create and c) send out automated invitations to users to continue using the new list(s) in place of

[REBOL] eGroups Rebol-List replacement list Re:(2)

2000-10-15 Thread jackseay
I've started 9 egroups lists and am a member of 52 others. Spam is non-existant all all the lists I am on. Most of them I just consult once in a while online to update myself. Some I keep on hand for occasional reference. A few I actually download in my mail program. They are incredibly easy t

[REBOL] eGroups Rebol-List replacement list Re:(2)

2000-10-13 Thread Al . Bri
mdinowit wrote: > Let me start by being totally honest and saying I hate egroups as they are a hidden spam engine. I haven't found that to be the case, and, I've been on several eGroups lists for two years. They do send out adverts with each message, but this can be eliminated with the payment of

[REBOL] eGroups Rebol-List replacement list Re:(2)

2000-10-13 Thread davidv
Seconded! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 11:32 AM Subject: [REBOL] eGroups Rebol-List replacement list Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Rishi wrote: > > Otherwise, what shall we call this discussion group? > > Call