[REBOL] epoch? Re:(9)

1999-10-29 Thread petr . krenzelok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Petr, > > Well, it can, just that right now it isn't. ;-) Put in a request for it if > you think it's important. ;-) Why should I? Isn't it a little bit inconsistent and so shouldn't it be put into request queue automatically? You know, I'm just lazy :-) -pekr-

[REBOL] epoch? Re:(9)

1999-01-02 Thread rryost
Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] See comments below: - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 2:07 PM Subject: [REBOL] epoch? Re:(8) > [snip - some algorithms] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >That appears to be a Julian day referenc

[REBOL] epoch? Re:(9)

1999-11-06 Thread rryost
I finally implemented those JForth words in REBOL and am in the process of submitting a script to rebol.org. Look for it there in a day or so. I'll probably have to make some cosmetic changes to get it through their ROBOT. Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PRO

[REBOL] epoch? Re:(9)

1999-11-09 Thread rryost
Sorry for the belated reply. I've worked out a script, julian.r, that converts dates to Julian Day Numbers, JD, for dates from 1-1-0001 to over 31-12-3000. I've submitted it to www.rebol.org, but as they seem to be somewhat slow, I'll include it herein. I'll also attach it. Sorry for the length,