Hi Joel,
this response was written on Thursday last week. At the time the message I
am responding to was your latest message to the list. Since then you have
sent a few other messages.
Text begins here ===>
R Stands For Relative!
I decided to review your messages bottom up (the latest mes
Hi Joel,
you quoted me:
>> The line in which 'b was created wasn't changed. Most dramatically, it
>> continues to be the exact same line you commented on as
>>
>> >the creation of B
>> >is "dynamic" as opposed to A, where the creation is "static"
>>
> ...
>> Let me see an explanation that main
At 11:37 PM 12/21/99 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi, I had a problem to find your post and respond to it (sorry).
Tell me which one you couldn't find and I'll be happy to email you a copy
off list.
>
>just want to point out some errors made by you:
>
>1) In Rebol A and B don't mean the same as you sugges
Ahoj, Petre, hezke vanoce (Hi, Peter, Merry Christmas)
can't resist to show you a few examples of Rebol code (just for fun, don't
be afraid).
Ex1:
f: func [/local a][
do func [] [
a: ""
]
insert a "1"
]
Results:
>> f
== ""
>> f
== ""
interesting, isn't it?
Ex2:
a: [""]
b:
Hi Elan.
Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 11:18 PM
Subject: [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(7)
> Hi Russell,
>
> You translated the repeated evaluation of the function into repea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When you look at the function's code, you may think that the instructions
> above are incorrect. Isn't 'a assigned as a reference to an emtpy string
> each time the function is evaluated? No. A literal string is global and
> therefore the originally empty literal stri
