>> I can't think of a better method for doing what I want it to do.
> surely a case for text as images?
> make the text you don't want read as an image, with no alt text.
Since narrator seems to say the window title by default, why not change your
page titles match the text as in:
Yellow - Ba
Quoting Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear Group,
>
> Doing a google check with allinurl:hereticpress.com/ I discovered my
> site was being duplicated on another site
> http://literature-universe.info/siteinfo.php/www.hereticpress.com/
> Dogstar/Novels/NUNC.html
>
> I get an access denied error
Quoting Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear Group,
>
> Doing a google check with allinurl:hereticpress.com/ I discovered my
> site was being duplicated on another site
> http://literature-universe.info/siteinfo.php/www.hereticpress.com/
> Dogstar/Novels/NUNC.html
>
> I get an access denied error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't think of a better method for doing what I want it to do.
surely a case for text as images?
make the text you don't want read as an image, with no alt text.
;o)
***
List Guidelines: http://webst
>
> I changed my .htaccess file to give him a graphic saying stolen
> content from hereticpress.com
>
>
Apologies ahead of time as I realize this is off topic. But, since
everyone here can be affected by this, I feel the information is important.
I'm guessing that you've gotten the issue reso
Hi All,
I wanted
to know whether I can store search result from any known site with me or not? (If
this search is free).
Lets
suppose I want to store the response of
“http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=searching+tech&btnG=Google+Search”
with me. I m using html/_javascript_/Ajax but
> in your testcase, Firefox, Safari, Opera and other modern browsers
> drop the whole box containing [green div 1] and [green div 2]. That
> is the correct behaviour in this case: the width of the floated
> parent is not specified, and depends on the width of the content
> (known: the width
On Sep 7, 2006, at 5:27 AM, Doug Wigginton wrote:
Thanks for taking a look. Just to confirm, on the right half of the
screen the second Green div drops below the first green div when
you resize
to 600x800 in Firefox?
Like this:
[grey div][green div 1]
[green div 2]
and not
[
On 7/9/06 10:37 AM, "Elliot Schoemaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Dixon wrote:
>> A few people have pointed out that they use the .leftNav etc because
>> they are more useful to their clients and I would agree that .leftNav is
>> far more obvious than .col1. However, those names are only
David Dixon wrote:
> Nice little blog entry you have there Mike,
> I like the honesty you've conveyed in your
> opinions [...]
Thank you David :-)
> [...] what is this .col1? what's in it? does it have
> a particular purpose? [...]
I agree in that it's not very telling as to
Lea de Groot wrote:
There aren't many cases where there is a need to do this.
So, when the answer to 'what will this do on the page?' starts with 'all
these items will...' then they should have a classname that is meaningful.
When the answer is 'they all do this; but some of them have this
ap
David Dixon wrote:
A few people have pointed out that they use the .leftNav etc because
they are more useful to their clients and I would agree that .leftNav is
far more obvious than .col1. However, those names are only useful until
the site needs a redesign/restructure (actually 3 months later w
David Dixon wrote:
A few people have pointed out that they use the .leftNav etc because
they are more useful to their clients and I would agree that .leftNav is
far more obvious than .col1. However, those names are only useful until
the site needs a redesign/restructure (actually 3 months later
Title: Re: [WSG] Site content stolen is there anyone to report it to in the USA
I remember a couple of years ago this happening to a woman on another list I’m on. They were linking to her graphics folder – so she just added huge letters on top of the original graphics saying something like ‘STO
Lea de Groot wrote:
I do the same thing (.left, .right, etc) too.
I think it works, and only in very specific cases, because you *aren't*
going to change what these look like - you are far more likely to remove
the class.
I would personally question that would be true for the most part, the
On 9/6/06, Samuel Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is considered an acceptable total page size for the web these days?
Clearly the smaller the better but I've put together a fairly graphic heavy
travel website with a homepage size of about 300k. With GZIP switched on in
the server I ima
Anyone know where I can find a semantic, unobtrusive, accessible marquee
javascript? As in a stock price 'ticker' ? If someone's got some code
already writeen up, that would be great.
Cheers ;o)
Richard
***
List Guidelines:
//webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
__ NOD32 1.1742 (20060906) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 anti
Just playing devil's advocate here, but perhaps it can be thought of
in a different light. If the purpose of the image is to illustrate or
demonstrate some element of content within the page, then would the
image cease to be part of the presentation layer and hence become part
of the content laye
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I'd go with something along those lines, yes, or even more generically
(if you foresee that at some point you may not want all images on the
same position, but differentiate them some other way - e.g. one has a
blue border, the other a red border, etc) having classnames
I will be off-campus from Thursday, Sept 7 through Friday, Sept 8. I
will return to campus on Monday, Sept 11.
For technical assistance, or if this is an urgent web-related matter,
then contact the ITS Helpdesk at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or call
612-659-6600.
Otherwise, I will reply to your message wh
Doug : hang on, I just double checked to make sure, and now the green divs are
moving under the grey div. I could have sworn that didn't happen
before, spooky
stuff...
Will have a play.
Nick
--
Nick Roper
partner
logical elements
Quoting Doug Wigginton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Nick,
Than
Hi Doug,
Yup, that's correct. [grey div] stays left and [green div 1] and [green div 2]
stay right, but [green div 2] moves underneath [green div 1]
Note: I'm not actually changing the resolution of the screen, simply resizing
the browser window.
Cheers,
Nick
--
Nick Roper
partner
logical el
Hi Doug,
It appears that FF does not take the child elements into consideration when
floating elements. I have an example below which comes close to the behavior
I think you were looking for.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11-transitional.dtd";>
Trouble with floats
* { margin:0px; pa
Doug Wigginton wrote:
[...] The idea is that when the browser resizes, the second
left-floated div will drop down below the first enabling all the
content to display in an 600 x 800 resolution. This works in IE6
(win) but not in Firefox, therefore my css is probably
wrong/incomplete. In FireFo
Nick,
Thanks for taking a look. Just to confirm, on the right half of the screen the second Green div drops below the first green div when you resize to 600x800 in Firefox?
Like this:
[grey div][green div 1]
[green div 2]
and not
[grey div]
[green div 1 ][green div2]
On 6 Sep 2006, at 12:13, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I often find myself using 'functional' class names for a handful of
specific tasks, but often these are used in parallel with semantic
class
names, for example:
.noPrint has only one simple rule, which I know wil
Hello Group,
For about a week I had a draft started on my blog. In answering Designer's
question about p:first-line a can of worms was opened up. I'm grateful
because it showed me a side of a topic I hadn't really considered previously
and was I prepared to simply write about the subject of Cla
Works for me in FF - i.e. the second div drops below the first as you
reckon it
should.
Nick
--
Nick Roper
partner
logical elements
Quoting Doug Wigginton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear Group,
I've finished reading CSS Mastery, and yet I'm still not quite getting
something right with my float
Dear Group,
I've finished reading CSS Mastery, and yet I'm still not quite getting something right with my floats.
(A test case is below, it's pretty simple).
In my DIV that's floated right, I have two DIVs that are floated left. The idea is that when the browser resizes, the second left-floa
If this is a bit off topic I apologize.
I am creating a website for my grand daughter's
use. http://www.designbyatfb.com/wisd/sw-one.html
I am supposing that I consider this a accessibility issue for her as she can't
yet read. Stretching a bit I know.
I've 10 of 48 words (or pages com
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/ says it has to wiegh 8 seconds.
That´s relative for each computer, of course...
They have a really interesting validator.
Regards;
Eugenio.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/g
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
a img, img.posA, img.posB, img.posC {
background-color : #fff;
border : 0;
}
img.posA {
float : left;
margin : 0 15px 5px 0;
}
img.posB {
float : right;
margin : 0 0 5px 15px;
}
img.posC {
mar
Tony Crockford wrote:
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
That said, for my clients, using .left, .right, .center will be more
intuitive.
exactly!
For some clients it's also easier to use table layouts and font tags...
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
Not sure what the law is in the US, but I think its the same the world
over - if they republish your material, that will be in breach of copyright.
Can you grab a cached snapshot of their page from Google? That will
prove it.
Suggest you write to them and say you will sue them for breach of
Hello Tim,
Can understand that your fairly miffed. Just remember that it really is
a compliment.
Write to them and let them know that they should have asked permission
and that you would like the feed to be removed asap.
If they don't respond to your request then you could consider asking a
law
On 9/6/06 9:32 AM, "Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doing a google check with allinurl:hereticpress.com/ I discovered my
> site was being duplicated on another site
> http://literature-universe.info/siteinfo.php/www.hereticpress.com/
> Dogstar/Novels/NUNC.html
Site's not coming up for me now.
Copyright infringement should be reported to the host of the offendng site.
Since the US is governed by DMCA the host will be required to suspend the
offending site until copyright infringement has been corrected.
Do a whois on the domain - find the host - then go to the host site and look
for th
Hi Tom,
Of course - sorry about that, a copy and paste oversight...
Just after video feedback tho as there are so many more variables with
different file types, conversion, playback and file size.
Thanks,
M.
Tom Livingston wrote:
On 9/5/06 10:48 PM, "Ido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
avi,
You could report it but I doubt anybody would do anything about it unless
you pursued it with a lawyer over there, hardly worth it. Just alter the
images to be something offensive, that'll make them change it pretty
quickly.
Otherwise just ring them up and have a chat, if you use Skype then it'l
Dear Group,
Doing a google check with allinurl:hereticpress.com/ I discovered my
site was being duplicated on another site
http://literature-universe.info/siteinfo.php/www.hereticpress.com/
Dogstar/Novels/NUNC.html
I get an access denied error 403 when trying to see my content on their
si
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
That said, for my clients, using .left, .right, .center will be more
intuitive.
exactly!
;o)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsg
RE: img.left, img.right
Designer wrote:
> 1) It's clear what it's for (semantic?)
I do the same thing for embedded images and I would think that this is okay
and finding another way would be a challenge. But I'll take a stab at it
since I've been enlightened on this a bit.
img.posA {}
On 9/5/06 10:48 PM, "Ido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> avi, asf, wmv, mpg, mp4, fla, swf, mov, 3gp
.fla is not a video format. Were you thinking of .flv? If so, you would need
a Flash .swf to play that.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx:
I often find myself using 'functional' class names for a handful of
specific tasks, but often these are used in parallel with semantic class
names, for example:
.noPrint has only one simple rule, which I know will never change.
Similarly I occasionally use .leftAlign & .rightAlign but again o
L-J Lacey wrote:
--- Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
So, would you criticise this as 'not best practice'?
I think the point is that if you decided to change the
left images to the right/top/bottom/etc it would no
longer be semantic, and would potentially be confusing
for you later on, or
--- Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> .img-left {
> float: left;
> text-align: center;
> background: white;
> margin : 10px 20px 10px 0px;
> }
>
> .img-right {
> float: right;
> text-align: center;
> background: white;
> margin : 10px 0px 10px 20px;
> }
>
>
Matthew Pennell wrote:
If all you're trying to do is indent the first line of each paragraph,
you don't need to use :first-line at all.
#description p { text-indent: 3em; }
Amazing! I'd have expected that to indent the whole paragraph!
Thanks Matthew, and to all others who responded.
--
Best
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Maybe it's philosophical hairsplitting, but "indent" still describes
the visual effect you're trying to achieve, rather than being a name
describing either the function or a characteristic of the content
itself. IMHO "first" falls under that second category (it's an
att
Hi Samuel
How much of your 300kb is HTML? It may be ok if your html is only 50Kb,
as that will compress to 15k or something.
I have a similar scenario using IIS compression, working on an insurance
application for a car manufacturer... a lot of their remote dealerships
are only connected at
Mathew Patterson wrote:
You have probably heard this same argument in reference to using
instead of . The idea is that the class name you use
should reflect the semantic *meaning* of what it does, not
necessarily the physical way it achieves that meaning.
The idea is fine and recommendable.
On 06/09/2006, at 6:13 PM, Matthew Pennell wrote:
On 9/6/06, Samuel Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is considered an acceptable total page size for the web these
days?
Clearly the smaller the better but I've put together a fairly graphic
heavy
travel website with a homepage size of
On 9/6/06, Samuel Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is considered an acceptable total page size for the web these days?
Clearly the smaller the better but I've put together a fairly graphic heavy
travel website with a homepage size of about 300k. With GZIP switched on in
the server I ima
53 matches
Mail list logo
