[WSG] CSS confusion

2006-09-23 Thread Designer
In the recent 'Links for light reading', the author of: http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html Uses the following: #outer {height: 400px; overflow: hidden; position: relative;} #outer[id] {display: table; position: static;} and I don't understand the [id] bit. I've

[WSG] browser font sizing - was [ In-page font sizer]

2006-09-23 Thread Designer
Justin Carter wrote: On 9/23/06, Christian Heilmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When it comes down to it, font resizers are fancy toys as an excuse for a design that has too small fonts from the start. I do agree, although on some occassions it's also a request from a client where they have an

Re: [WSG] CSS confusion

2006-09-23 Thread John Faulds
It's the 'attribute' selector and is not understood by IE 7. In the example, rules for all browsers are in black, rules for IE-only in blue and rules for all but IE(6) in green. On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:43:53 +1000, Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the recent 'Links for light

[WSG] IE 7 but mainly (unsual) Safari probelm

2006-09-23 Thread Tee Peng
Good morning and evening! I encounter a very strange Safari problem with floated divs. Running out of idea to fix it and thereby requested permission from client to post the page for help. In the below 'edit-waypoint' page, on the left column at the bottom, there are three floated divs

Re: [WSG] IE 7 but mainly (unsual) Safari probelm

2006-09-23 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Sep 23, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Tee Peng wrote: I encounter a very strange Safari problem with floated divs. Running out of idea to fix it and thereby requested permission from client to post the page for help. In the below 'edit-waypoint' page, on the left column at the bottom, there are

Re: [WSG] browser font sizing - was [ In-page font sizer]

2006-09-23 Thread Christian Montoya
On 9/23/06, Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin Carter wrote: On 9/23/06, Christian Heilmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When it comes down to it, font resizers are fancy toys as an excuse for a design that has too small fonts from the start. I do agree, although on some occassions it's

Re: [WSG] In-page font sizer

2006-09-23 Thread Justin Carter
On 9/23/06, Derek Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At which point shouldn't you as a person that gets it aim for getting the client to agree to test with some users and observe their behaviour? And when 7 out of 10 people go to use the font resizer right away, or clearly have trouble

Re: [WSG] browser font sizing - was [ In-page font sizer]

2006-09-23 Thread Justin Carter
On 9/23/06, Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Considering that IE7 will soonbe the most used browser (by far!), and that it has a zoom feature (and responds to ctrl+/- as in Firefox), does this mean that all our worries about font sizing etc should eventually disappear? (including being able to

Re: [WSG] MS Staff Blogs not W3C compliant...

2006-09-23 Thread David Dixon
This may sound a bit like im pissing all over your fire here, but I was bored, and in typical me fashion, I had to check your own site against the same validators that you ran passed the microsoft blogs... All good, except for the feedback page (http://egressive.com/HurlDinger/Feedback). 5

Re: [WSG] MS Staff Blogs not W3C compliant...

2006-09-23 Thread Peter Ottery
Dave wrote: - I sent messages to the Microsofties whose blogs - I tested, alerting them in a friendly tone to - this rather embarrassing faux pas Spare a thought for a team of pro-active developers that are probably working within a massive organisation complete with business dependencies and

Re: [WSG] CSS confusion

2006-09-23 Thread David Hucklesby
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:43:53 +0100, Designer wrote: [...]  http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html  Uses the following:  #outer {height: 400px; overflow: hidden; position: relative;}  #outer[id] {display: table; position: static;}  and I don't understand the [id] bit.  

Re: [WSG] MS Staff Blogs not W3C compliant...

2006-09-23 Thread Al Sparber
From: Dave Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] A few days ago, my browsers ended up on http://www.microsoft.com/nz/msdn/team.aspx after reading a few stories about IE7 and the fact that it won't be W3C standards compliant like nearly every other browser (e.g. various Mozilla Gecko-based browsers like