Am I correct in thinking that styling the optgroup (and label) with CSS
simply doesn't work?
I am trying to get some vertical space around the label element, but so
far my expts have produced no effect whatsoever. I've googled this, but
only found a 2004 ref which seems a bit bleak. As it's
Try this link:http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menu/form.htmlOn 10/20/06, Designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Am I correct in thinking that styling the optgroup (and label) with CSS
simply doesn't work?I am trying to get some vertical space around the label element, but sofar my expts have produced no
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a reference (or simply post here) of characters
that are valid to use in HTML class attribute values. I've searched
and searched but can't find a definitive list.
Many thanks,
Charles
***
List
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:41:02PM +0100, Charles Roper wrote:
Can anyone point me to a reference (or simply post here) of characters
that are valid to use in HTML class attribute values. I've searched
and searched but can't find a definitive list.
It's a CDATA list, you can use any character
On 20 Oct 2006, at 12:41:02, Charles Roper wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a reference (or simply post here) of characters
that are valid to use in HTML class attribute values. I've searched
and searched but can't find a definitive list.
When in doubt, read the spec ;-)
HTML 4.01 defines
The niftycube method claims to be able to do rounded tabs:
http://www.html.it/articoli/niftycube/index.html
See example 4: http://www.html.it/articoli/niftycube/nifty4.html
You and mix and match curved and uncurved, I'm sure.
Clint
On 10/19/06, TomGou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Charles Roper skrev:
Can anyone point me to a reference (or simply post here) of characters
that are valid to use in HTML class attribute values.
Be aware that there are different rules for class names in CSS vs. HTML!
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#q6
In CSS 2.1, identifiers
On 20 Oct 2006, at 13:42:51, Anders Nawroth wrote:
Charles Roper skrev:
Can anyone point me to a reference (or simply post here) of
characters
that are valid to use in HTML class attribute values.
Be aware that there are different rules for class names in CSS vs.
HTML!
Hello all!
On the page http://keryx.se/dev/brCh/browserval.xhtml I have a DOM-scripting
demo. (For reasons I'll explain below you can't use MSIE to view the page.) The
page per se is not meant to be accessible or good design, but the script is
supposed to be an example of best practice
Thanks all - what a great response. I did end up reading the CSS 2.1
spec but as has been pointed out, a CSS selector does not necessarily
equal an HTML class name. Here's a bit of background: I need to
include the following in a class name (for use in a microformat):
I don't get the paranoia.
IE7 is much more secure than IE6. If you don't like IE7, you can simply
uninstall it and ie6 is restored after a reboot.
As a web dev, you need to install IE7 and test your sites. Ignoring it isn't
going to help your web development.
Ted
-Original Message-
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 04:45:49PM +0100, Charles Roper wrote:
From what I gleaned from the CSS spec, I escaped it to this:
class=urn\:lsid\:ubio\.org\:namebank\:530114
Is that now valid (in terms of CSS) as far as anyone can see?
You need to escape the characters in the _CSS_, not in the
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I have two Unordered Lists:
- one contains text in A elements (a href=#Text/a)
- one contains image in A elements (a href=#img //a)
CSS:
li {display:inline}
How come the display of the two is *different* (regarding orientation) when
I use RTL with the DIR attribute?
Charles Roper wrote:
I need to include the following in a class name (for use in a microformat):
class=urn:lsid:ubio.org:namebank:530114
Which microformat? That's a URI and so a more semantic place for it is
in a href=urn:... or maybe link href=urn:.
From what I gleaned from the CSS
Ted Drake wrote:
I don't get the paranoia.
IE7 is much more secure than IE6. If you don't like IE7, you can simply
uninstall it and ie6 is restored after a reboot.
As a web dev, you need to install IE7 and test your sites. Ignoring it isn't
going to help your web development.
Ted
Paranoia? I
On 20/10/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Roper wrote:
I need to include the following in a class name (for use in a microformat):
class=urn:lsid:ubio.org:namebank:530114
Which microformat? That's a URI and so a more semantic place for it is
in a href=urn:... or maybe link
On 20 Oct 2006, at 15:26:10, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
On 20 Oct 2006, at 13:42:51, Anders Nawroth wrote:
Be aware that there are different rules for class names in CSS
vs. HTML!
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#q6
Good point, Anders; Charles, please note this as a
On 20 Oct 2006, at 17:26:35, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Ted Drake wrote:
I don't get the paranoia.
IE7 is much more secure than IE6. If you don't like IE7, you can
simply
uninstall it and ie6 is restored after a reboot.
As a web dev, you need to install IE7 and test your sites.
Ignoring it
On 20 Oct 2006, at 18:34:44, Charles Roper wrote:
OK, so urn:lsid:ubio.org:namebank:530114 would actually be a valid
class name then? The LSID would almost certainly never be used as a
CSS selector (should never rule the possibility out, though), so if
it's valid in its unescaped form then
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I have two Unordered Lists:
- one contains text in A elements (a href=#Text/a)
- one contains image in A elements (a href=#img //a)
CSS:
li {display:inline}
How come the display of the two is *different* (regarding
orientation) when I use RTL
Charles Roper wrote:
On 20/10/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Roper wrote:
I need to include the following in a class name (for use in a
microformat):
class=urn:lsid:ubio.org:namebank:530114
Which microformat? That's a URI and so a more semantic place for
it is in a
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I just found the issue and put something together:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/test/whitespace_and_rtl_direction.asp
Just an observation: whitespace doesn't matter in Opera 9 (from prev1
onwards).
So, whitespace may be important to browsers when dealing with such
cases,
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I just found the issue and put something together:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/test/whitespace_and_rtl_direction.asp
Just an observation: whitespace doesn't matter in Opera 9 (from prev1
onwards).
So, whitespace may be important to browsers when
I don't know if it's actually related or not, but we had to change our pages
to work on IE7. See for example
http://www.w3.org/International/articles/language-tags/
The stuff floated to the right (ie. that column) was only partially visible
and you couldn't click inside the search field or on
I agree, though, that a virtual machine is the way to go for those who
need multiple installs, especially given that Virtual PC for Windows is
now a free download.
Does using Microsoft's Virtual PC make any difference as to the legality
of running the same copy of Windows on different
Hi Everyone,
So I've been having troulbe with IE-PNG relations - not entirely
surprising. Doing a search through my WSG archives I found the email
to which this responds. The trouble is, it's not working. In fact,
it's giving an identical result to no correction. Then again, so does
trying
26 matches
Mail list logo
