, not all potential problems with all possible
combinations.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 10:54 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Access Keys and large
Of Matthew
PennellSent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:31 PMTo:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] Access Keys and large
sites
On 7/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Patrick,In
the same way, accessibility in general is always less of an issue onan
Well if no-one else is going to say it, then I will have to:
Don't use Access Keys except on an Intranet site.
IF you do a quick Google search for 'Access Keys' and 'Bad' you should find
several articles which have researched the number of such keys that do not
clash with a Browser, OS or AT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well if no-one else is going to say it, then I will have to:
Don't use Access Keys except on an Intranet site.
And why would an intranet warrant different treatment from any other web
content?
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
Title: Access Keys and large sites
Hello All
Im pretty new to the whole accessibility thing but Im trying.
The latest question mark that arose in my mind regards to access keys: since theres only 10 numeric keys (including 0) what does one do if youre building a site that exceeds 10
