Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-31 Thread Bruce
New W3C Member = The Web Standards Group A tought or am I nute? Bruce Prochnau BKDesign Solutions - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML Maybe if we had a trade association

Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-31 Thread MarcLuzietti
Maybe if we had a trade association / union we could elect someone to represent us and pay membership dues to send the person. There've got to be at least 6-7000 standardistas who could chip in a buck. -- Marc Luzietti Flagship Project Bayview Financial, L.P. (305) 341-5624 Also, it's great t

Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-31 Thread Niels Fröhling
Lachlan Hunt schrieb: > Niels Fröhling wrote: >>> Anyway, does anyone else have any thoughts or speculation about this? >> >> I much agree with this: >> >> http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/ > > I don't agree with everything he said. You might like to see my > response to that. > http://

Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-31 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Richard Czeiger wrote: You make some good points Lachlan, but to be honest, http://www.alleged.org.uk/pdc/2003/xhtml2-cite.html rang very true for me That particular article is 3 years old and was referring to an old draft of XHTML 2.0. The cite element has since returned. http://www.w3

Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-31 Thread Richard Czeiger
aking note. But they shouldn't be the ones driving the thing... R:o) - Original Message - From: "Lachlan Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML Niels Fröhling wrote: Anyway, doe

Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Niels Fröhling wrote: Anyway, does anyone else have any thoughts or speculation about this? I much agree with this: http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/ I don't agree with everything he said. You might like to see my response to that. http://lachy.id.au/log/2006/10/fixing-html --

Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-30 Thread Niels Fröhling
> Anyway, does anyone else have any thoughts or speculation about this? I much agree with this: http://blog.fawny.org/2006/10/28/tbl-html/ [and I AM a computer-junkie who loves math and science, but more so I'm humanist (-> accessability, and I love to see my Grand-Ma reading my blog) and read

Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Dan Brickley wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Tim Berners-Lee announced the W3C's new plan for HTML and the Working Groups this morning [1]. If it's grand re-think time, I'd like to see the Compound Document Formats work (CDF, http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/ etc ) sit a lot closer to the heart of th

Re: [WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-28 Thread Dan Brickley
Lachlan Hunt wrote: Hi, Tim Berners-Lee announced the W3C's new plan for HTML and the Working Groups this morning [1]. [...] Anyway, does anyone else have any thoughts or speculation about this? If it's grand re-think time, I'd like to see the Compound Document Formats work (CDF, http://w

[WSG] W3C's new Plan for HTML

2006-10-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Hi, Tim Berners-Lee announced the W3C's new plan for HTML and the Working Groups this morning [1]. From what I was told last night and read in the announcement this morning, the work on HTML will be officially split (though it has been unofficially for the past 2 years anyway). AIUI, the n