Re: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-22 Thread TuteC
haha, that´s my solution! Using em is the way I was looking for. Thank you for your help; Eugenio. On 7/22/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TuteC wrote: Thank you very much, Georg. That´s exactly what I want: that the content overflows or the div expands but mantaining the same

Re: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-18 Thread Elle Meredith
On 18/07/2006, at 12:04 AM, wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:Germ wrote: I disagre with you. Yes content is the most important but graphics is not that far behind.  Alot of people are drawned in by the look among other things like being  a known name and content etc. I do

Re: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-18 Thread David Laakso
Elle Meredith wrote: I believe strongly that a page should download fast and have a higher percentage of text than images but on the other hand I also believe that the look of the home page should be be eye catching and images usually have major contribution to this factor. In the end, it

Re: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-17 Thread Tom Livingston
On 7/15/06 4:39 AM, Elle Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wanted to ask for a site check and code review please. Any suggestions for maybe writing the code different or maybe better are welcome. Looks great. Checked on Mac Opera 9.01. Oh and IMHO, I¹ve seen many more boring pages than

FW: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-17 Thread Tom Livingston
From: Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:25:18 -0400 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Conversation: [WSG] site check and code review Subject: Re: [WSG] site check and code review I wanted to ask for a site check and code review please. Any suggestions for maybe

Re: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-16 Thread Germ
Hey my 2cIts a bit boring for my likeingThe banner is a bit bland and the webpage itself is just information. What about graphics? The banner is just a school of fish. Maybe a collage or something would be nice. The code may be correct and web standard but what if it is boring? Does it still

Re: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-16 Thread dwain . alford
Germ wrote: Hey my 2c Its a bit boring for my likeing The banner is a bit bland and the webpage itself is just information. What about graphics? The banner is just a school of fish. Maybe a collage or something would be nice. The code may be correct and web standard but what if it is

Re: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-16 Thread Germ
I disagre with you.Yes content is the most important but graphics is not that far behind.Alot of people are drawned in by the look among other things like being a known name and content etc. I do not know about you but I always judge the book by its cover first. I wonder if there are any stats or

RE: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-16 Thread Adam Burmister \(DSL AK\)
but what good are informational graphics if you're blind? Is there a strong blind diving community out there? -A Germ wrote: Hey my 2c Its a bit boring for my likeing The banner is a bit bland and the webpage itself is just information. What about graphics? The banner is just a

[WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-15 Thread Elle Meredith
Hello,I wanted to ask for a site check and code review please.Any suggestions for maybe writing the code different or maybe better are welcome.page: http:waznelle.com/td/css: http://waznelle.com/td/css/base.cssI also have a couple of problems with the page.The layout is supposed to be 3 columns:

Re: [WSG] site check and code review

2006-07-15 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Elle Meredith wrote: page: http:waznelle.com/td/ css: http://waznelle.com/td/css/base.css 1. unless I declare * {margin:0; padding: 0;} many objects do not fit in the layout and get pushed down. Now, I tried to limit my paddings and margins so I don't know where they come from. Will have