RE: [WSG] The Standard Way...???

2006-07-04 Thread Ryan Moore
: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] The Standard Way...??? On 7/4/06, Ryan Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, I haven't encountered a site where a customer asked that I used > named anchors in the form of the old. This is the format they have and want >

Re: [WSG] The Standard Way...???

2006-07-04 Thread Christian Montoya
On 7/4/06, Ryan Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello all, I haven't encountered a site where a customer asked that I used named anchors in the form of the old… This is the format they have and want to stick with… ... Ok. Aside from the fact I know I have to go rename all these anchor names

Re: [WSG] The Standard Way...???

2006-07-04 Thread Christian Montoya
On 7/4/06, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you are using a doctype where named anchors are separated, ... * deprecated. I meant to say deprecated. I need more sleep. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... portfolio.christianmontoya.com

Re: [WSG] The Standard Way...???

2006-07-04 Thread Nick Harris
Hi Ryan,named anchors can just be replaced with Ids on your target elements, like so; What is a consumer proposal? How do I qualify for a consumer proposal? Who presents my consumer proposal to my creditors?What is ... ?voila :) -Nick Harrishttp://www.pixelenvy.co.uk