Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Shawn J. Cassick wrote: Germ wrote: Again another thing that im not 100% sure on the strict DTD for XHTML1.0 doesnt allow javascript right??? What? Of course it allows javascript. // Note: Don't use , as is common for HTML 4 http://lachy.id.au/lo

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-12 Thread Germ
Mmmm it is actually an external _javascript_ file. I will play around with the other suggestions (look at webpages etc) On 4/12/06, Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Germ> Again another thing that im not 100% sure on> the strict DTD for XHTML1.0 doesnt allow _javascript_ rig

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-12 Thread Shawn J. Cassick
Germ wrote: Again another thing that im not 100% sure on the strict DTD for XHTML1.0 doesnt allow javascript right??? so if u want javascript included u wuld use the loose DTD?? Am i right in saying this??? you need to add another meta tag to define what form of text you are using, if it

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-12 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Germ wrote: Result: Tentatively passed validation File:Cartoon.html Encoding:utf-8 Doctype:XHTML 1.0 Strict Root Namespace: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml No Character Encoding Found! Falling back to UTF-8. A couple of W3C pages pointing at the issue... 1:

RE: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-12 Thread Peter Williams
From: Germ > Again another thing that im not 100% sure on > the strict DTD for XHTML1.0 doesnt allow javascript right??? > so if u want javascript included u wuld use the loose DTD?? > Am i right in saying this??? Use an external javascript file. -- Peter Williams **

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-12 Thread Joshua Street
On 4/12/06, Germ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the strict DTD for XHTML1.0 doesnt allow javascript right??? > > so if u want javascript included u wuld use the loose DTD?? > > Am i right in saying this??? Nope. :-) ** The discussion list for h

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-11 Thread Germ
Again another thing that im not 100% sure on the strict DTD for XHTML1.0 doesnt allow _javascript_ right??? so if u want _javascript_ included u wuld use the loose DTD?? Am i right in saying this???

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-11 Thread Germ
Ok I have fixed up the problems and worked around them (got rid of "target" etc) So wen i valiadted I have no 'errors' but i get this message: Result: Tentatively passed validation File:Cartoon.html Encoding:utf-8 Docty

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-11 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Germ wrote: So u can actually apply the "float: left" to the image instead of "align:left" See: ...for details about the float-property. Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ** The discussion

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-11 Thread Germ
So u can actually apply the "float: left" to the image instead of "align:left"  > 3.- attribute align doesn´t exists on DTD strict. You can use> text-align:right in your css >> i might play around with tat idea, makes senseYou have a few options.Since it is images you want to align, you should

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-11 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Germ wrote: The reason i have the "target" is so it can open up in a new page. but it culd dispaear if its easier Plenty of dispute around the (un)usefulness / (un)friendliness of opening new windows/tabs. My advice is: don't use 'target' and don't open new windows/tabs. That way you can al

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-11 Thread Germ
The reason i have the "target" is so it can open up in a new page. but it culd dispaear if its easier 3.- attribute align doesn´t exists on DTD strict. You can use text-align:right in your css i might play around with tat idea, makes sense On 4/11/06, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-11 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Peter Williams wrote: http://www.germworks.net Short answer: Change your doctype to transitional, it will allow those attributes. Not a good solution, but if that 'target' *must* stay in there, then it is probably the best one. Long answer: Standby for Lachlan's reply on the evils of servin

RE: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-11 Thread Peter Williams
From: Germ > I have a webpage (http://www.germworks.net) > Error Line 35 column 9: there is no attribute "target". Short answer: Change your doctype to transitional, it will allow those attributes. Long answer: Standby for Lachlan's reply on the evils of serving XHTML as text/html. -- Peter Wi

Re: [WSG] help needed in validating webpage

2006-04-10 Thread felix . zapata
hi, about your problems: 1.- target attribute doesn´t exists on DTD strict. http://domscripting.com/blog/display/56 http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200603/the_target_attribute_and_opening_new_windows/ 2.- attribute language is not necessary so you can remove it 3.- attribute align doesn´t