Re: [Live-demo] Notebook-review

2016-03-14 Thread Brian M Hamlin
+1   On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:28:36 +1100, Cameron Shorter wrote: Hi Massimo, I also agree that a review process is in order. I'd actually extend to suggest that a development process should be described as well, and that we should align with existing OSGeo-Live documentation processes. Ie

Re: [Live-demo] Notebook-review

2016-03-14 Thread Cameron Shorter
Hi Massimo, I also agree that a review process is in order. I'd actually extend to suggest that a development process should be described as well, and that we should align with existing OSGeo-Live documentation processes. Ie, we should be able to find Notebook processes linked from here: https

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1645: Rasdaman not installed on 32 bit system

2016-03-14 Thread OSGeo
#1645: Rasdaman not installed on 32 bit system -+--- Reporter: kalxas | Owner: live-demo@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker | Milestone: OSGeoLive9.5 Component: LiveDVD | Resolution: Keywords: | ---

[Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1645: Rasdaman not installed on 32 bit system

2016-03-14 Thread OSGeo
#1645: Rasdaman not installed on 32 bit system -+-- Reporter: kalxas | Owner: live-demo@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker | Milestone: OSGeoLive9.5 Component: LiveDVD | Keywords: -+-

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1522: GeoNetwork 3.0.3 fails to start in 32bit system

2016-03-14 Thread OSGeo
#1522: GeoNetwork 3.0.3 fails to start in 32bit system --+--- Reporter: kalxas| Owner: live-demo@… Type: defect| Status: reopened Priority: blocker | Milestone: OSGeoLive9.5 Component: LiveDVD |

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1522: GeoNetwork 3.0.3 fails to start in 32bit system (was: GeoNetwork 3.0.1 fails to start in a VM)

2016-03-14 Thread OSGeo
#1522: GeoNetwork 3.0.3 fails to start in 32bit system --+--- Reporter: kalxas| Owner: live-demo@… Type: defect| Status: reopened Priority: blocker | Milestone: OSGeoLive9.5 Component: LiveDVD |

[Live-demo] OSGeoLive 9.5 status: RC1

2016-03-14 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Greetings, According to our schedule [1], we are one week away from OSGeoLive 9.5, so today we release our first Release Candidate [2] [3]. Please test your favorite application(s) and report your findings on our Trac instance [4]. Cheers, Angelos [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/

Re: [Live-demo] Notebook-review

2016-03-14 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi Massimo, I agree that we need a review process for all notebooks (not just GSoC). +1 Angelos On 03/14/2016 01:11 AM, massimo di stefano wrote: From the discussion we had so far it is clear to me we need a *official revision procedure* to have the work done for the GSoC integrated into the

Re: [Live-demo] GSOC 2016

2016-03-14 Thread massimo di stefano
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 11:57 AM, sarthak agarwal wrote: > > Hello devs, > > I read the last year's GSOC page and proposal and now I guess I have s brief > idea about the project. And I am very interested in contributing to it. > I today mailed massimo and waiting for his reply. Hi Sarthak Can

Re: [Live-demo] GSOC 2016

2016-03-14 Thread sarthak agarwal
Hello devs, I read the last year's GSOC page and proposal and now I guess I have s brief idea about the project. And I am very interested in contributing to it. I today mailed massimo and waiting for his reply. But I cannot find the reports of the last year's project. So I have some doubts regard