eugene updated this revision to Diff 107628.
eugene retitled this revision from "Extend 'target symbols add' to load symbols
from a given file by UUID." to "Extend 'target symbols add' to set symbol file
for a given module".
eugene edited the summary of this revision.
eugene added a comment.
Fou
jessicah updated this revision to Diff 107623.
jessicah added a comment.
A test case was added.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35525
Files:
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/help/TestHelp.py
source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp
Index: source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp
===
clayborg added a comment.
Add a test for this and this will be good to go.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35525
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
jingham added a comment.
BTW, the second listing was after applying your patch, showing it clearly does
the right thing...
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35525
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
jingham added a comment.
Yes, your version clearly has the test right. I was wondering why this didn't
have a more dramatic ill-effect, but it turns out that this function is only
used for printing argument help text, which it clearly messes up:
(lldb) help format
--
jessicah added reviewers: jingham, clayborg.
jessicah added a comment.
Add Jim and Greg per Zachary's suggestion.
Jessica
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35525
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailma
I am OOO for another week, can you add jingham or clayborg instead?
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:40 AM Jessica Han via Phabricator <
revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> jessicah added reviewers: tfiala, zturner.
> jessicah added a comment.
>
> Todd, Zachary,
>
> Can you help review this change?
>
> T
jessicah added reviewers: tfiala, zturner.
jessicah added a comment.
Todd, Zachary,
Can you help review this change?
Thanks,
Jessica
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35525
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cg
clayborg added a comment.
I am not sure how sensitive typemaps are to the names of the arguments? Maybe
we can just have you use different names and then the two typemaps won't
collide? You can also write some manual code to do the remapping without
typemaps.
Regardless of whether you are goin
eugene added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35607#814982, @clayborg wrote:
> So we should just make sure this works:
>
> (lldb) target symbols add --shlib a.out debug_binaries/a.out
>
I like this, and I'm going to implement it. Pavel is right and the way UUID is
set for modules wit
clayborg added a comment.
One other idea if we go with the UUID::Type solution: if we have UUIDs that are
different, we could ask the ObjectFile (ObjectFileELF) to see if it thinks the
files go together. Not sure if there is anything in the ELF file that would
allow us to do that. In Mach-O we
clayborg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35607#815769, @labath wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35607#814982, @clayborg wrote:
>
> > So we should just make sure this works:
> >
> > (lldb) target symbols add --shlib a.out debug_binaries/a.out
> >
> >
> > The --uuid option is t
abhishek.aggarwal added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33035#803801, @clayborg wrote:
> Much better on the API with Swig. Just a few inlined questions around
> GetRawBytes.
Hi Greg .. Thanks for feedback. My comments are inlined.
Comment at: tools/intel-features/in
labath created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: mgorny, srhines.
Herald added a reviewer: EricWF.
std::queue is just a fancy wrapper around another container, so all we
need to do is to delegate to the it.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35666
Files:
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/function
labath added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35607#814982, @clayborg wrote:
> So we should just make sure this works:
>
> (lldb) target symbols add --shlib a.out debug_binaries/a.out
>
>
> The --uuid option is there to help you match up without having to specify the
> file path. If I a
labath added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35311#814941, @jingham wrote:
> This isn't about this patch, but replying to:
>
> > debugserver replies to the k packet instead of just dropping the connection
> > - stopping code adjusted, although we should probably consider aligning the
>
16 matches
Mail list logo