[Lldb-commits] [lldb] 75f97cd - [lldb] Fix the man page build

Author: Raphael Isemann Date: 2021-03-11T19:51:47+01:00 New Revision: 75f97cdafe52cbfd4ba39c3b8c334ab0ca0106a2 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/75f97cdafe52cbfd4ba39c3b8c334ab0ca0106a2 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/75f97cdafe52cbfd4ba39c3b8c334ab0ca0106a2.dif

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D98441: [lldb] Fix the man page build

This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds. This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rG75f97cdafe52: [lldb] Fix the man page build (authored by teemperor). Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D98196: [lldb] Add missing debugserver/lldb-server dependencies to check-lldb

This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds. This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rGaada8984e617: [lldb] Add missing debugserver dependency to check-lldb (authored by teemperor). Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits. Changed prio

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] aada898 - [lldb] Add missing debugserver dependency to check-lldb

Author: Raphael Isemann Date: 2021-03-11T15:55:43+01:00 New Revision: aada8984e617058bfc9aa1f879d584ad04d2e7df URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aada8984e617058bfc9aa1f879d584ad04d2e7df DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aada8984e617058bfc9aa1f879d584ad04d2e7df.dif

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D97017: [lldb-server] Exit the DataAvailableCallback loop when `done` or `interrupt` are set

labath added a comment. What are the situations where we set `done` or `interrupt`? The ones I could find are: - the `k` packet. This packet is (for good reasons) specified very vaguely. The spec says it should have no reply, but lldb will actually try to listen for a reply anyway. I think tha

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D98289: [lldb] Fix DW_AT_ranges DW_FORM_sec_offset not using DW_AT_rnglists_base (used by GCC)

dblaikie added a comment. In D98289#2618881 , @jankratochvil wrote: > Ah there is already a discussion from it: > http://lists.dwarfstd.org/pipermail/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org/2021-March/004765.html Yeah, happy to discuss/clarify/help with anything in

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] 3d47f1f - [lldb] Remove implicit_const_form_support.test

Author: Pavel Labath Date: 2021-03-11T10:47:06+01:00 New Revision: 3d47f1f9b826003df4c19767d433095df89d1bc5 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3d47f1f9b826003df4c19767d433095df89d1bc5 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3d47f1f9b826003df4c19767d433095df89d1bc5.diff

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D96458: [LLDB] Add support for Arm64/Linux dynamic register sets

labath added a comment. Yes, definitely. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D96458/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D96458 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-c

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D96458: [LLDB] Add support for Arm64/Linux dynamic register sets

omjavaid added a comment. In D96458#2618846 , @labath wrote: > Would something like F15819833: reginfo.diff > do the trick? It needs a bit of cleanup > (I haven't actually removed `ConfigureRegisterInfos` function yet

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D98289: [lldb] Fix DW_AT_ranges DW_FORM_sec_offset not using DW_AT_rnglists_base (used by GCC)

jankratochvil added a comment. Ah there is already a discussion from it: http://lists.dwarfstd.org/pipermail/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org/2021-March/004765.html Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D98289/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D98289

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D98289: [lldb] Fix DW_AT_ranges DW_FORM_sec_offset not using DW_AT_rnglists_base (used by GCC)

jankratochvil added a comment. There is some discussion what is valid vs. invalid DWARF-5 and whether DWARF-5 needs some updates: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490 The planned change is that with this version of the patch `m_ranges_base` defauled to 0 but my idea for the 'planne

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D96458: [LLDB] Add support for Arm64/Linux dynamic register sets

labath added a comment. Would something like F15819833: reginfo.diff do the trick? It needs a bit of cleanup (I haven't actually removed `ConfigureRegisterInfos` function yet -- I just moved it right next to the reginfo creation), but I think should make it

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D98289: [lldb] Fix DW_AT_ranges DW_FORM_sec_offset not using DW_AT_rnglists_base (used by GCC)

labath added a comment. I'm not sure what are the "planned changes", but have you compared this implementation with the one in llvm. IIRC, I tried to implement it the same one as the one over there, but it seems the llvm one has changed since then. At a cursory glance it looks like it does not