[Lldb-commits] [lldb] e85c723 - [lldb] Re-phase comments in `ScriptedThread.get_stackframes` method (NFC)

2022-11-13 Thread Med Ismail Bennani via lldb-commits
Author: Med Ismail Bennani Date: 2022-11-13T22:19:14-08:00 New Revision: e85c7233b429004faed2472e300abe40c4ab7cf3 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e85c7233b429004faed2472e300abe40c4ab7cf3 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e85c7233b429004faed2472e300abe40c4ab7cf3.

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] 1239d37 - [lldb] Remove unused `stack_memory_dump` member from ScriptedProcess class (NFC)

2022-11-13 Thread Med Ismail Bennani via lldb-commits
Author: Med Ismail Bennani Date: 2022-11-13T22:06:09-08:00 New Revision: 1239d37bdbfbe79289a2fc578aad8360f84c315d URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1239d37bdbfbe79289a2fc578aad8360f84c315d DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1239d37bdbfbe79289a2fc578aad8360f84c315d.

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D133036: [InstCombine] Treat passing undef to noundef params as UB

2022-11-13 Thread Arthur Eubanks via Phabricator via lldb-commits
aeubanks updated this revision to Diff 475017. aeubanks added a comment. I somehow missed the previous comments rebased on top of fixing UB in tests changes Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133036/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133036

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] 99a0566 - [lldb][test] Avoid UB in optimized_code test

2022-11-13 Thread Arthur Eubanks via lldb-commits
Author: Arthur Eubanks Date: 2022-11-13T14:21:55-08:00 New Revision: 99a05667217162029d1de84d4a49d041c06be175 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/99a05667217162029d1de84d4a49d041c06be175 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/99a05667217162029d1de84d4a49d041c06be175.diff

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D133036: [InstCombine] Treat passing undef to noundef params as UB

2022-11-13 Thread Tim Neumann via Phabricator via lldb-commits
TimNN added a comment. I'm sorry for the noise. Further investigation has shown that this happens when Rust is doing (thin) LTO, and I don't think this patch can be considered in any way "at fault" here, so this is the last you'll hear from me on the topic here. I don't know whether the fault i