teemperor added inline comments.
Comment at:
lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ASTResultSynthesizer.cpp:409
+ // static MyClass *__lldb_expr_result_ptr = &c; // Points to stack.
+ // __lldb_expr_result_ptr(__lldb_expr_result_ptr);
+ // } // End of exp
vsk added inline comments.
Comment at:
lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ASTResultSynthesizer.cpp:409
+ // static MyClass *__lldb_expr_result_ptr = &c; // Points to stack.
+ // __lldb_expr_result_ptr(__lldb_expr_result_ptr);
+ // } // End of expressio
teemperor added inline comments.
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/IRForTarget.cpp:2026
+ i = call->eraseFromParent();
+ continue;
+}
I do wish we had a better way to do the iterate-while-erase algorithm
teemperor created this revision.
teemperor added a reviewer: LLDB.
teemperor added a project: LLDB.
Herald added a subscriber: JDevlieghere.
teemperor requested review of this revision.
At the moment we codegen or interpret the IR in exactly the way as it is
generated by Clang.
This patch runs th
