[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2023-08-31 Thread Louis Dionne via Phabricator via lldb-commits
ldionne commandeered this revision. ldionne added a reviewer: t-tye. ldionne added a comment. Herald added a subscriber: jplehr. Herald added a project: All. [GitHub PR transition cleanup] This has been open for 2 years with multiple subscribers able to see this discussion, but there doesn't

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2022-01-04 Thread Louis Dionne via Phabricator via lldb-commits
ldionne removed projects: libc++, libunwind. ldionne removed reviewers: libunwind, libc++, ldionne. ldionne added a comment. Herald added projects: libc++, libunwind. Herald added a reviewer: libc++. Herald added a reviewer: libunwind. Removing from the runtimes review queue -- please ping me

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2021-11-02 Thread Louis Dionne via Phabricator via lldb-commits
ldionne added a comment. Herald added a project: Flang. If there is no plan to move forward with generating `.docx` documentation, can we please abandon this review? I'm trying to clean up libc++'s review queue. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2021-08-03 Thread Fangrui Song via Phabricator via lldb-commits
MaskRay added a comment. I remember that we even converted some `*.md` to `*.rst` to remove the number of supported documentation formats, so I agree that adding support the even less used `*.docx` may not be the proper direction. Thanks for splitting this off. Repository: rG LLVM Github

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2021-08-03 Thread Tony Tye via Phabricator via lldb-commits
t-tye added a comment. In D106339#2890258 , @ldionne wrote: > What's the benefit of having docx documentation? We generate HTML > documentation, which ends up in the website, and that seems strictly superior > to generating docx. What do you need it

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2021-08-03 Thread Tony Tye via Phabricator via lldb-commits
t-tye updated this revision to Diff 361407. t-tye added a comment. Factor out documentation and CMake file changes unrelated to adding DOCX support to D106736 . Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2021-08-03 Thread Tony Tye via Phabricator via lldb-commits
t-tye updated this revision to Diff 361402. t-tye added a comment. Split change for clang makefile to elimnate Sphinx warnings of missing .rst fies when building man pages into D106734 . Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2021-07-22 Thread Louis Dionne via Phabricator via lldb-commits
ldionne requested changes to this revision. ldionne added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. What's the benefit of having docx documentation? We generate HTML documentation, which ends up in the website, and that seems strictly superior to generating docx. What do you

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D106339: Add support to generate Sphinx DOCX documentation

2021-07-22 Thread Tony Tye via Phabricator via lldb-commits
t-tye created this revision. t-tye added a reviewer: scott.linder. Herald added subscribers: libcxx-commits, mgorny. Herald added a reviewer: bollu. Herald added a reviewer: MaskRay. Herald added a reviewer: sscalpone. Herald added a project: libunwind. Herald added a reviewer: libunwind. t-tye