This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG2e6b6522296e: [LLDB] Fix missing return value in
SBBreakpointLocation::GetQueueName() (authored by fixathon).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
clayborg accepted this revision.
clayborg added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
As long as all values being set on the location differ from any that might be
set on the breakpoint itself for any get/set tests you added this is good to go!
Repository:
rG LLVM
fixathon marked an inline comment as done.
fixathon added a comment.
Address the review comments
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660
___
fixathon updated this revision to Diff 448463.
fixathon added a comment.
Address the review comments and inline the tests into an existing test function
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660
clayborg added a comment.
Looks good. I would just inline the contents of
shadowed_bkpt_locations_setters_getters_test into
test_shadowed_location_getters_setters since it isn't use anywhere else.
Comment at:
fixathon updated this revision to Diff 448457.
fixathon added a comment.
Fix duplicate name of the test function
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660
Files:
fixathon updated this revision to Diff 448453.
fixathon added a comment.
Added unit tests, and verified the fix is working.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660
Files:
fixathon planned changes to this revision.
fixathon added a comment.
Working on adding unit tests
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660
___
clayborg added a comment.
Thanks for the info! Should be easy to test this function at least like you
mentioned
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660
So far as I can tell, we don't have any significant tests for the "queue
specific breakpoint or breakpoint location" feature. There's a pretty
extensive test for identifying queues & getting more detail from them in
test/API/macosx/queues/TestQueues.py, but it doesn't test the breakpoint
clayborg added a comment.
There must be a test for this, obviously we don't have one, but check the blame
log and ask the original author how this should be tested.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130660/new/
fixathon created this revision.
fixathon added reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, labath.
Herald added a project: All.
fixathon requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: LLDB.
Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
Seems like a typo in the function that never returns a significant
12 matches
Mail list logo