[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D131837: [lldb] [gdb-remote] Initial support for multiple ContinueDelegates

labath added a comment. In D131837#3734204 , @mgorny wrote: > In D131837#3732971 , @labath wrote: > >> This sort of makes sense to me, but it's not clear to me how is this >> selection logic going to apply to pac

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D131837: [lldb] [gdb-remote] Initial support for multiple ContinueDelegates

mgorny added a comment. In D131837#3732971 , @labath wrote: > This sort of makes sense to me, but it's not clear to me how is this > selection logic going to apply to packets other than stop-replies. All of the > forked processes are going to share the

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D131837: [lldb] [gdb-remote] Initial support for multiple ContinueDelegates

labath added a comment. This sort of makes sense to me, but it's not clear to me how is this selection logic going to apply to packets other than stop-replies. All of the forked processes are going to share the same pty, so it's going to be literally impossible to distinguish the `O` packets, f

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D131837: [lldb] [gdb-remote] Initial support for multiple ContinueDelegates

mgorny created this revision. mgorny added reviewers: labath, krytarowski, emaste, jingham. Herald added a subscriber: arichardson. Herald added a project: All. mgorny requested review of this revision. Introduce the initial support for handling multiple ContinueDelegates in GDBRemoteClientBase::S