Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16772: Fix single stepping over the IT instruction

2016-02-02 Thread Tamas Berghammer via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL259509: Fix single stepping over the IT instruction (authored by tberghammer). Changed prior to commit: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16772?vs=46542=46647#toc Repository: rL LLVM

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16772: Fix single stepping over the IT instruction

2016-02-02 Thread Tamas Berghammer via lldb-commits
tberghammer added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16772#340950, @clayborg wrote: > Looks good. > > A related comment about IT instructions. You need to be careful when software > single stepping through instructions that are in the middle of an ITSTATE > block. You can NOT use a 16 bit

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16772: Fix single stepping over the IT instruction

2016-02-02 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-commits
clayborg added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16772#341629, @tberghammer wrote: > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16772#340950, @clayborg wrote: > > > Looks good. > > > > A related comment about IT instructions. You need to be careful when > > software single stepping through instructions

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16772: Fix single stepping over the IT instruction

2016-02-01 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-commits
clayborg added a comment. Looks good. A related comment about IT instructions. You need to be careful when software single stepping through instructions that are in the middle of an ITSTATE block. You can NOT use a 16 bit instruction that isn't a BKPT otherwise you change your instructions.

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16772: Fix single stepping over the IT instruction

2016-02-01 Thread Muhammad Omair Javaid via lldb-commits
omjavaid accepted this revision. omjavaid added a comment. Looks good. Was there a test failing in testsuite due to this? http://reviews.llvm.org/D16772 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org