Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D17650: Fix TestInlines.py on Windows

2016-02-29 Thread Adrian McCarthy via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL262255: Fix TestInlines.py on Windows (authored by amccarth). Changed prior to commit: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17650?vs=49208=49409#toc Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D17650 Files:

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D17650: Fix TestInlines.py on Windows

2016-02-26 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-commits
zturner added inline comments. Comment at: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/cpp/inlines/inlines.h:1-4 @@ +1,4 @@ +int inner_inline (int inner_input, int mod_value); +int outer_inline (int outer_input); +int not_inlined_2 (int input); +int not_inlined_1 (int input);

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D17650: Fix TestInlines.py on Windows

2016-02-26 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-commits
zturner added a comment. I don't know where we draw the line between `test/lang` and `test/functionalities` but I feel like the purpose of this test is just to make sure LLDB has the general ability to handle setting breakpoints on inline call sites. With that in mind, it make more sense to

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D17650: Fix TestInlines.py on Windows

2016-02-26 Thread Adrian McCarthy via lldb-commits
amccarth created this revision. amccarth added reviewers: zturner, spyffe. amccarth added a subscriber: lldb-commits. The inlining semantics for C and C++ are different, which affects the test's expectation of the number of times the function should appear in the binary. In the case of this