Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20673: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables

2016-05-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL270863: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables (authored by labath). Changed prior to commit: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20673?vs=58587&id=58630#toc Repository: rL LLVM

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20673: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables

2016-05-26 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-commits
Don't think this is needed anymore, lgtm On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:59 AM Todd Fiala wrote: > tfiala added a comment. > > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20673#440967, @labath wrote: > > > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20673#440660, @labath wrote: > > > > > Enabling this should not make any difference i

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20673: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables

2016-05-26 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-commits
tfiala added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20673#440967, @labath wrote: > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20673#440660, @labath wrote: > > > Enabling this should not make any difference in the common case, as llvm > > already adds one set of exception-disabling flags if you don't specify th

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20673: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables

2016-05-26 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-commits
tfiala accepted this revision. tfiala added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. This looks fine to me. ( http://reviews.llvm.org/D20671 also looked fine, looks like I missed looking at that yesterday). Since Zachary initially wanted this on Windows, I suspect he needs to

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20673: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables

2016-05-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
labath added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20673#440660, @labath wrote: > Enabling this should not make any difference in the common case, as llvm > already adds one set of exception-disabling flags if you don't specify the > flag I mentioned (llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake). (And

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20673: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables

2016-05-26 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-commits
tfiala added a comment. Having a look now. I don't recall the context yet. http://reviews.llvm.org/D20673 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20673: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables

2016-05-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
labath added a comment. Zachary, Todd, you added these in http://reviews.llvm.org/D3929. I know it's a long time, but do you recall what was the original motivation for that? In light of the issue in http://reviews.llvm.org/D20671, I've experimenting with compiling lldb with exceptions enabled,

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20673: [cmake] Remove the LLDB versions of the exception-controlling variables

2016-05-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
labath created this revision. labath added reviewers: zturner, tfiala. labath added a subscriber: lldb-commits. One can still use the LLVM variables to control this: LLVM_ENABLE_EH, LLVM_ENABLE_RTTI. It's not clear to me why one would want to control these at lldb level and it's generally not ev