labath added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889#1104882, @aemerson wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889#1104823, @aprantl wrote:
>
> > Thanks for jumping on this Amara — I just wanted to point out that we
> > ususally don't revert lldb changes that only break the lldb-xcode
> On May 18, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Amara Emerson via Phabricator
> wrote:
>
> aemerson added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889#1104823, @aprantl wrote:
>
>> Thanks for jumping on this Amara — I just wanted to point out that we
>> ususally don't revert
aemerson added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889#1104823, @aprantl wrote:
> Thanks for jumping on this Amara — I just wanted to point out that we
> ususally don't revert lldb changes that only break the lldb-xcode bot if they
> pass on the lldb-cmake bot at the same time. When this
Thanks for jumping on this Amara — I just wanted to point out that we ususally
don't revert lldb changes that only break the lldb-xcode bot if they pass on
the lldb-cmake bot at the same time. When this happens it usually means that
the lldb Xcode project must be updated and it's too much to
aprantl added subscribers: jingham, jasonmolenda, labath.
aprantl added a comment.
Thanks for jumping on this Amara — I just wanted to point out that we ususally
don't revert lldb changes that only break the lldb-xcode bot if they pass on
the lldb-cmake bot at the same time. When this happens
aemerson reopened this revision.
aemerson added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Hi Pavel,
I reverted this in r332730 due to the bot breaking. Please have a look and
commit again when ready.
Thanks,
Amara
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889
aemerson added a comment.
This caused a failure in green dragon:
http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/lldb-xcode/6644
Can you please fix or revert this change, thanks.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889
___
lldb-commits mailing
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL332719: [DWARF] Extract indexing code into a separate class
hierarchy (authored by labath, committed by ).
Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits.
Changed prior to commit:
clayborg accepted this revision.
clayborg added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp:1984
GetObjectFile()->GetModule()->GetMutex());
- Index();
-}
Yikes, who was
labath updated this revision to Diff 147326.
labath added a comment.
- s/AppleIndex/AppleDWARFIndex
- move things to separate files
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889
Files:
source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/AppleDWARFIndex.cpp
source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/AppleDWARFIndex.h
clayborg added inline comments.
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFIndex.cpp:40
+
+std::unique_ptr AppleIndex::Create(
+Module , DWARFDataExtractor apple_names,
clayborg wrote:
> Move all AppleIndex stuff to a dedicated .cpp file?
Do we want
clayborg added a comment.
Looks fine. Just one question on keeping the DWARFIndex::Create() functions so
they all have the same signature.
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFIndex.cpp:40
+
+std::unique_ptr AppleIndex::Create(
+Module , DWARFDataExtractor
JDevlieghere added a comment.
Looks good to me, but I'll defer to Greg as I've never actually touched this
code myself.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
labath created this revision.
labath added reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere.
Herald added subscribers: aprantl, mgorny.
This places the `if(m_using_apple_tables)` branches inside the
SymbolFileDWARF class behind an abstract DWARFIndex class. The class
currently has two implementations:
-
14 matches
Mail list logo