https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70303
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Unless there are objections this is going in end of today.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70303
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
@omjavaid Any objections?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70303
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70303
>From bbcdfa3bb4844f609efabbb819444bbab02b02f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:28:02 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb][AArch64][Linux] Reanme IsEnabled to
IsPresent
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@
NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm64::CacheAllRegisters(uint32_t _size) {
return error;
// Here this means, does the system have ZA, not whether it is active.
bulbazord wrote:
You could probably remove this comment
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70303
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70303
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: David Spickett (DavidSpickett)
Changes
For most register sets, if it was enabled this meant you could use it, it was
present in the process. There was no present but turned off state. So "enabled"
made sense.
Then ZA came along (and soon
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70303
For most register sets, if it was enabled this meant you could use it, it was
present in the process. There was no present but turned off state. So "enabled"
made sense.
Then ZA came along (and soon to