labath wrote:
Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
felipepiovezan wrote:
Pushed a fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
felipepiovezan wrote:
@dzhidzhoev I think @labath 's suggestion might fix this (LD_EXTRAS)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
felipepiovezan wrote:
hi @dzhidzhoev, I think this commit is causing the arm lldb incremental bots to
fail.
Could you have a look or revert if you think the fix is not obvious? This is
our most important bot, so it would be nice to get it green again
https://github.com/dzhidzhoev closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/dzhidzhoev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
>From eaf50dc4a1f5285676c16b59c4149483d94fb986 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladislav Dzhidzhoev
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 04:53:23 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb][test] Disable PIE for some API tests
These
@@ -3,4 +3,8 @@
# C_SOURCES := b.c
# EXE := b.out
+ifndef PIE
+ LDFLAGS := -no-pie
labath wrote:
Setting LD_EXTRAS is the typical way to pass linker flags from here (the same
for other files)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
https://github.com/labath edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
labath wrote:
> > Ok, I see now. It's an ld.bfd vs ld.lld thing. You probably have your clang
> > configured to use lld. LLD does not put relocation addends into the data
> > section (on both arm and intel). ld.bfd does, which is why this sort of
> > happens to work there. Was your intention
dzhidzhoev wrote:
> Ok, I see now. It's an ld.bfd vs ld.lld thing. You probably have your clang
> configured to use lld. LLD does not put relocation addends into the data
> section (on both arm and intel). ld.bfd does, which is why this sort of
> happens to work there. Was your intention to
labath wrote:
Ok, I see now. It's an ld.bfd vs ld.lld thing. You probably have your clang
configured to use lld. LLD does not put relocation addends into the data
section (on both arm and intel). ld.bfd does, which is why this sort of happens
to work there. Was your intention to test with
labath wrote:
What do the failures look like? I tried to force -pie on some of the tests that
you modified, and I couldn't get them to fail. Is this somehow specific to
remote execution?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
___
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Vladislav Dzhidzhoev (dzhidzhoev)
Changes
When PIE is enabled on a platform by default, these tests fail since the
`target variable` command can't read a global string variable value before
running an inferior process.
---
Full diff:
https://github.com/dzhidzhoev created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93808
When PIE is enabled on a platform by default, these tests fail since the
`target variable` command can't read a global string variable value before
running an inferior process.
>From
15 matches
Mail list logo
