https://github.com/jasonmolenda closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110965
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/felipepiovezan approved this pull request.
This LGTM! Thanks a lot of fixing it.
Your comments match my observations and I tested this patch with a test case
where we stop on every instruction of a few functions and assert we can unwind
correctly.
https://github.com/llvm/llv
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff c1343a29216f08ec762b3e58572e5c3e41f6f285
8deef52bd49a54c8ea23d97460641d01d0daf898 --e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Jason Molenda (jasonmolenda)
Changes
The x86 assembly instruction scanner creates incorrect UnwindPlans when a
mid-function epilogue has a non-epilogue instruction in it.
The x86 instruction analysis which creates an UnwindPlan handles mid
https://github.com/jasonmolenda created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110965
The x86 assembly instruction scanner creates incorrect UnwindPlans when a
mid-function epilogue has a non-epilogue instruction in it.
The x86 instruction analysis which creates an UnwindPlan handles mid-fu
