A build with msbuild or from VS2013 using the .sln file produce the same
directory structure.
The error looks a lot like what I see when I don’t have lldb_d.pyd set up
correctly. It can’t load the lldb python module (a link to the shared library),
so it gets cranky.
Was there an error
Interesting, okay..
This does appear to be an accumulation issue. You made it most of the way
through before the issue hit. I suspect we're leaking file handles. It
probably doesn't hit the per-process limit on multiprocessing because the
leaked files get spread across more processes.
(All
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:42 AM Jim Ingham wrote:
> I have held from the beginning that the only tests that should be written
> using HandleCommand are those that explicitly test command behavior, and if
> it is possible to write a test using the SB API you should always do
Thanks for the response , sorry for the delay. As a matter of fact I
actually got rid of the system python and installed my custom version.
I do suspect it is a linking problem though. When I build liblldb.dll it
always loads python27.dll instead of python27_d.dll. Do you happen to
know
Can you try to regenerate CMake with that command line and see if that
helps?
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:17 PM kwadwo amankwa wrote:
>
> No
>
> On 05/10/15 21:15, Zachary Turner wrote:
>
> Are you using -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug when you generate CMake?
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25063
Todd Fiala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25063
Bug ID: 25063
Summary: multiple-debuggers test: testprog is left running when
test times out
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: All
> On Sep 23, 2015, at 6:39 PM, d...@burble.org wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:44:41AM -0700, Greg Clayton wrote:
>> We currently coalesce breakpoints to avoid the user stopping multiple times
>> on the same source line. This might have been done to avoid stepping issues
>> we might have
It would be ok to relax the test for eTypeExecutable to also allow
eTypeSharedLibrary if, on many systems, it is possible to run a binary of type
shared library as an executable. If it changes from system to system, then we
could ask the platform (PlatformLinux if your case?) to verify if a
That is just fine, you will need to submit patches prior to checking stuff in
so the other FreeBSD and Linux folks can try things out to make sure things
don't break on other platforms. If things diverge a lot, we might have a base
pthread debugging class that can be subclassed so that FreeBSD
Different tools are giving me different numbers.
At the time of the error, Windbg says there are about 2000 open handles,
most of them are Event handles, not File handles. That's higher than I'd
expect, but not really concerning.
Process Explorer, however, shows ~20k open handles per Python
You are missing a call to the initialize function:
lldb::SBDebugger::Initialize();
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Stefan Kratochwil via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem with lldb deadlocking upon a call to
> lldb::SBDebugger::Terminate().
>
> I am
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25062
Todd Fiala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A couple of fixes to the Python/LLDB Windows build process were
committed on Oct 1st, I suggest you try building a more recent revision
(especially if setting CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE to Debug as suggested by Zach
fixes your issue).
On 6/10/2015 3:15 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev wrote:
Are you
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25057
Bug ID: 25057
Summary: On x86_64-FreeBSD Platform, LLDB hangs while debugging
an inferior with 'int3' assembly instruction.
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Thanks for the ideas.
With `--test-runner-name threading-pool`, I get too many open files.
With `--test-runner-name multiprocessing-pool`, the suite runs fine.
My machine has 40 logical cores.
With `--threads=20`: SUCCESS (and perhaps _faster_).
With `--threads=30`: SUCCESS.
With
16 matches
Mail list logo