[lldb-dev] [Bug 27634] New: Spelling fixes for lldb

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27634 Bug ID: 27634 Summary: Spelling fixes for lldb Product: lldb Version: 3.8 Hardware: PC OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P

Re: [lldb-dev] google/stable branch on git mirror?

We aren't qualifying it on our side so it hasn't gotten a stable/testing set of branches. -eric On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 4:15 AM Tamas Berghammer via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > +Eric Christopher > > Adding Eric as he was the last person merging changes to

Re: [lldb-dev] LTO debug info

> On May 3, 2016, at 6:35 AM, Philippe Lavoie > wrote: > > The code accessing another CU while indexing is in DWARFCompileUnit::GetDIE. > If the DIE is not in the current CU, it finds the CU that has it and calls > its ::GetDIE method, accessing its m_die_array

Re: [lldb-dev] LTO debug info

The code accessing another CU while indexing is in DWARFCompileUnit::GetDIE. If the DIE is not in the current CU, it finds the CU that has it and calls its ::GetDIE method, accessing its m_die_array data... So the question is: is it a producer (CU should be self-contained) or a consumer (the

Re: [lldb-dev] google/stable branch on git mirror?

+Eric Christopher Adding Eric as he was the last person merging changes to the google/stable branch. As far as I know nobody releases LLDB from that branch so I wouldn't rely on it too much (Android Studio release from master) but you can gave it a try if you want. Tamas

Re: [lldb-dev] Inquiry about breakpoints on demangled function names

Since I am working on debugger support for OCaml, I am dealing with symbols of the following form: camlFoo__bar_1010 The function name is prefixed with the "caml" followed by the local module name. OCaml is using a dot instead of a double colon to access function within a module, and is