Re: [lldb-dev] hashing pointers to strings

2018-02-09 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
A quick glance indicates that this is all dead code. I can't see anything that actually instantiates either of the pubnames classes. The DWARF pubnames tables were a previous attempt at producing DWARF indexes, but they didn't contain enough information to actually forstall deep dives into the

[lldb-dev] hashing pointers to strings

2018-02-09 Thread Adrian McCarthy via lldb-dev
DWARFDebugPubnamesSet.h has a type definition like this: typedef std::unordered_multimap, CStringEqualBinaryPredicate> cstr_to_index_mmap; In particular, note that the hasher will hash the *pointer *rather than the string it points to. It looks like this

[lldb-dev] [Bug 36331] New: Assertion failed: (idx < GetSize()), function GetItemAtIndex, file StructuredData.h, line 188

2018-02-09 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36331 Bug ID: 36331 Summary: Assertion failed: (idx < GetSize()), function GetItemAtIndex, file StructuredData.h, line 188 Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC

Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

2018-02-09 Thread Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:11, Dimitry Andric via Openmp-dev wrote: > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev > wrote: >> >>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote: > ... >>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >>> common root cause and do we have

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

2018-02-09 Thread Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev wrote: > >> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote: ... >> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >> common root cause and do we have a bug for it? ... > The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

2018-02-09 Thread Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers >> wrote: >>> >>> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in >>> a better state now. >>> >>> 6

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

2018-02-09 Thread Michał Górny via lldb-dev
W dniu śro, 07.02.2018 o godzinie 21∶51 +0100, użytkownik Hans Wennborg via Release-testers napisał: > Dear testers, > > There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in > a better state now. > > 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. > > Please test, let me know how it

[lldb-dev] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 source, docs and binaries available

2018-02-09 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
Hello everyone, Source, docs and binaries for LLVM-6.0.0-rc2 are now available at http://prereleases.llvm.org/6.0.0/#rc2 I'll add more binaries as they become available. Please report any problems you find, ideally as bugs marked as blockers of http://llvm.org/PR35804 Thanks, Hans _

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

2018-02-09 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > wrote: >> >> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in >> a better state now. >> >> 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. >> >> Please test, let

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged

2018-02-09 Thread Sylvestre Ledru via lldb-dev
Hello, On 07/02/2018 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > Dear testers, > > There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in > a better state now. > > 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. > > Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries. Loo