[lldb-dev] [Bug 37485] LLDB reads wrong registers on 64bit Windows

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37485 Stella Stamenova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

Re: [lldb-dev] Advice on architectures with multiple address spaces

Greg, Jim, what's your opinion here? What about having the class Address (pretty much as it is right now) and the struct AddressBase {   lldb::addr_t m_address;   lldb::as_t m_address_space;   ... } Another question is, which classes/code should use Address, AddressBase, and addr_t. Do you

[lldb-dev] [Bug 37496] New: Sometimes LLDB freeze after launching process

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37496 Bug ID: 37496 Summary: Sometimes LLDB freeze after launching process Product: lldb Version: 6.0 Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: [lldb-dev] Advice on architectures with multiple address spaces

The Address class may be suitable for the higher layers of lldb, but I don't think the it can ever be a blanket replacement for lldb::addr_t. It has way too much smartness built-in. We use addr_t in a lot of places that don't/shouldn't care about Targets, ExecutionContexts or Sections. All of

Re: [lldb-dev] Advice on architectures with multiple address spaces

On 04/19/2018 08:22 PM, Jim Ingham wrote: On Apr 19, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Greg Clayton wrote: On Apr 19, 2018, at 10:35 AM, Jim Ingham wrote: On Apr 19, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev wrote: On Apr 19,