FWIW, I’m supportive of this.
I do find SB API based tests to be powerful but extremely cumbersome to write.
If Vedant wants to write 15 different tests for the various cases he’s
covering, it’s easy to see that they would be much easier to write this way. It
is very powerful to have the test
I’m fine with it. I still would like to see inline tests ported to a custom
lit test format eventually, but this seems orthogonal to that and it can be
done in addition to this
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:25 PM Vedant Kumar wrote:
> Pinging this because I'd like this to go forward to make testing
Pinging this because I'd like this to go forward to make testing easier.
I know folks have concerns about maintaining completeness of the scripting APIs
and about keeping the test suite debuggable. I just don't think making
FileCheck available in inline tests is counter to those goals :).
I
Hello,
I need a testing local buildbot instance to develop a buildbot slave config:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 14:47:42 +0200, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 13:39, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:47:25 +0200, Pavel Labath wrote:
> > > *However*, for setting
