Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [cfe-dev] 7.0.1-final has been tagged

On 01/08/2019 11:36 AM, Ian Tessier via Release-testers wrote: > Can the ubuntu tarballs be published to the download site? They're not > available yet. > These are up on the download site now. -Tom > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:38 AM Brian Cain via cfe-dev > mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wro

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [lit] check-all hanging

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 9:08 PM Joel E. Denny wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:39 AM Adrian Prantl wrote: > >> >> >> On Jan 7, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Joel E. Denny via lldb-dev < >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:15 AM Davide Italiano >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 5,

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

Before I got around to coding this up I realized you can't take the address of constructors in C++, so the function address won't work as an identifier. On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:28 AM Jonas Devlieghere wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:27 AM Frédéric Riss wrote: > >> >> >> > On Jan 8, 2019, at

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Using Sphinx to generate documentation

For those interested, I've uploaded the latest version of the generated HTML: https://jonasdevlieghere.com/static/lldb/ I'd have to double check but I think that almost everything was ported over. The biggest issue is that the GDB to LLDB command map is totally unreadable with the RST generated t

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Using Sphinx to generate documentation

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:52 AM Stefan Gränitz via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Jonas, I think this is a great effort. Thanks! > > My current reviews do some small updates on the build page. Hope this > doesn't get in conflict with your work? > Thanks for the heads up Stefan. Th

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:27 AM Frédéric Riss wrote: > > > > On Jan 8, 2019, at 1:25 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > > > On 07/01/2019 22:45, Frédéric Riss wrote: > >>> On Jan 7, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > wrote: > >>> >

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Using Sphinx to generate documentation

Hi Jonas, I think this is a great effort. Thanks! My current reviews do some small updates on the build page. Hope this doesn't get in conflict with your work? Best Stefan > On 6. Dec 2018, at 18:02, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > The current LLDB website is wr

[lldb-dev] [Bug 40201] regression: can't build from source: The dependency target "cxx" of target "check-all" does not exist

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40201 Stefan Gränitz changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Stefan Gränitz ---

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

> On Jan 8, 2019, at 1:25 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > On 07/01/2019 22:45, Frédéric Riss wrote: >>> On Jan 7, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev >>> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/01/2019 19:26, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:40 AM Pave

[lldb-dev] [CMake] LLDB_TEST_(C/CXX)_COMPILER in patches for standalone and testing

Hi all I put a number of patches for review that are related to LLDB standalone builds and testing. They mostly clean up things that confused me while investigating the mysterious problem with the cxx target dependency [1][2]. One of the changes [4] has relevant effects on CMake parameters: it

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

On 07/01/2019 22:13, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:52 AM Tamas Berghammer > wrote: One problem is when the behavior of LLDB is not deterministic for whatever reason (e.g. multi threading, unordered maps, etc...). Lets take SBModul

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

On 07/01/2019 22:45, Frédéric Riss wrote: On Jan 7, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 07/01/2019 19:26, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:40 AM Pavel Labath > wrote:    I've