Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-26 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 05/25/2020 05:48 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:59 PM Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The >> current process is documented here: >> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html >> >>

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-26 Thread Eric Christopher via lldb-dev
This set of changes sounds good to me. Thanks! -eric On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:00 PM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The > current process is documented here: > https://llvm.org/docs/HowToR

[lldb-dev] [Bug 46049] New: inconsistent behaviors at -O2

2020-05-26 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46049 Bug ID: 46049 Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O2 Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priori

[lldb-dev] [Bug 46047] New: inconsistent behaviors at -O3

2020-05-26 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46047 Bug ID: 46047 Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O3 Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priori

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-26 Thread John McCall via lldb-dev
On 26 May 2020, at 18:24, Tom Stellard wrote: On 05/21/2020 05:54 PM, John McCall wrote: On 21 May 2020, at 14:59, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: Hi, I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The current process is documented here: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToRele

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-26 Thread Aaron Ballman via lldb-dev
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:22 AM Renato Golin via cfe-dev wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 23:10, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Maybe even stronger than "is allowed to commit", I think we should > > really think about it as the release manager owning the branch, and > > has f

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-26 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 05/21/2020 05:54 PM, John McCall wrote: > On 21 May 2020, at 14:59, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The >> current process is documented here: >> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html >> >> There are two pa

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-26 Thread Richard Smith via lldb-dev
These changes and clarifications make sense to me. On Thu, 21 May 2020, 12:00 Tom Stellard via llvm-dev, < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The > current process is documented here: > https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLL

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Release process changes

2020-05-26 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 23:10, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: > +1 > > Maybe even stronger than "is allowed to commit", I think we should > really think about it as the release manager owning the branch, and > has full authority over what goes into it or not. Consulting code > owners often makes