[lldb-dev] [Bug 47100] A project should not contain unreachable code.(Code is commented out partially)(project/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformRemoteAppleBridge.cpp:line 101)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47100 Jonas Devlieghere changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47101] LHS and RHS of a logical binary-operator (&&, ||), relational/equality binary-operator expression should not contain the same sub-expression.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Sy

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47101 Jonas Devlieghere changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47101] New: LHS and RHS of a logical binary-operator (&&, ||), relational/equality binary-operator expression should not contain the same sub-expression.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugi

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47101 Bug ID: 47101 Summary: LHS and RHS of a logical binary-operator (&&, ||), relational/equality binary-operator expression should not contain the same

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47100] New: A project should not contain unreachable code.(Code is commented out partially)(project/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX/PlatformRemoteAppleBridge.cpp:line 101)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47100 Bug ID: 47100 Summary: A project should not contain unreachable code.(Code is commented out partially)(project/lldb/source/Plugins/Platform/MacOSX

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: AArch64 Linux Memory Tagging Support for LLDB

Hi David, thanks for the great writeup. I hadn't been following the gdb MTE support. This all looks reasonable to me. A few quick thoughts -- The initial idea of commands like "memory showptrtag", "memory showtag", "memory checktag" - it might be better to put all of these under "memory tag

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47089] The use of if (Condition) {...} else if (Condition) {...} pattern should be avoided.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Language/ObjC/NSArray.cpp:line 826)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47089 Jonas Devlieghere changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47088] All allocated dynamic memory should be explicitly deallocated to avoid memory leaks.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Host/windows/Windows.cpp:line 146)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47088 Raphael Isemann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] RFC: AArch64 Linux Memory Tagging Support for LLDB

Hi all, What follows is my proposal for supporting AArch64's memory tagging extension in LLDB. I think the link in the first paragraph is a good introduction if you haven't come across memory tagging before. I've also put the document in a Google Doc if that's easier for you to read:

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47089] New: The use of if (Condition) {...} else if (Condition) {...} pattern should be avoided.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Language/ObjC/NSArray.cpp:line 826)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47089 Bug ID: 47089 Summary: The use of if (Condition) {...} else if (Condition) {...} pattern should be avoided.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Language/Obj

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47088] New: All allocated dynamic memory should be explicitly deallocated to avoid memory leaks.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Host/windows/Windows.cpp:line 146)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47088 Bug ID: 47088 Summary: All allocated dynamic memory should be explicitly deallocated to avoid memory leaks.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Host/windows/Windows.c pp:line 146)

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47086] A project should not contain unreachable code.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverAddress.cpp:line 90)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47086 Raphael Isemann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47086] New: A project should not contain unreachable code.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverAddress.cpp:line 90)

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47086 Bug ID: 47086 Summary: A project should not contain unreachable code.(llvm-project/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointRe solverAddress.cpp:line 90) Product: lldb Version:

[lldb-dev] [Bug 47083] New: then-branch and else-branch of the same if-statement should not be the same.（llvm-project/lldb/source/Symbol/ArmUnwindInfo.cpp:line 316 ）

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47083 Bug ID: 47083 Summary: then-branch and else-branch of the same if-statement should not be the same.（llvm-project/lldb/source/Symbol/ArmUnwindInfo.cp p:line 316 ）