Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here

Uploaded binaries for SLES12 and Ubuntu 16 x86_64. I realized that I'd forgotten rc3,4 ones so I uploaded them too. $ cat clang+llvm-11.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz.sha256 clang+llvm-11.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz.sha256 clang+llvm-11.0.0-rc4-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz.

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

I had accepted the patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D86670 , but then marked as "Request Changes" while we discuss the commands in this RFC after new comments came in. > On Oct 1, 2020, at 1:42 PM, Greg Clayton wrote: > > We spoke a bit after Panel's comments wh

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

We spoke a bit after Panel's comments which made sense and we propose the commands Walter sent below. Let us know what everyone thinks of this organization of the command structure! > On Oct 1, 2020, at 1:32 PM, Walter wrote: > > After a chat with Greg, we agreed on this set of commands > >

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB got SIGCHLD on hitting the breakpoint

LLDB 5 is really old and shouldn't be used for linux debugging as linux support had many issues back then. I would suggest downloading and building the latest and greatest LLDB from llvm.org or using the clang 10 release version of LLDB, or the new clang 11 release version tha

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

After a chat with Greg, we agreed on this set of commands trace load /path/to/json process trace start/stop process trace save /path/to/json thread trace start/stop thread trace dump [instructions | functions] Il giorno gio 1 ott 2020 alle ore 13:21 Greg Clayton ha scritto: > > > > On Oct 1, 2

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

> On Oct 1, 2020, at 7:08 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Thank you for writing this Walter. I think this document will be a > useful reference both now and in the future. > > The part that's not clear to me is what is the story with multi-process > traces. The file format enables

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

Hi Pavel, thanks for the comments. I'll reply inline > The part that's not clear to me is what is the story with multi-process traces. The file format enables those, but it's not clear how are they going be created or used. Can you elaborate more on what you intend to use those for? Something we

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [11.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here

On 30 Sep 2020, at 20:07, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > We had to pick up another bug fix, so here is another release > candidate: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5 tag was just created. I've built both rc4 and rc5, and again these did not need any patches. Main results on amd64-freebsd11:

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Processor Trace Support in LLDB

Thank you for writing this Walter. I think this document will be a useful reference both now and in the future. The part that's not clear to me is what is the story with multi-process traces. The file format enables those, but it's not clear how are they going be created or used. Can you elaborate