g
> sure they don’t get dropped.
> >>>
> >>> Finally, when all this work is done and we’re happy with the approach,
> we extend the SB API with overloads for the functions that currently take
> or return addr_t . I want to do this last so w
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 1:25 AM, Jason Molenda wrote:
>
> Hi Greg, Pavel.
>
> I think it's worth saying that this is very early in this project. We know
> we're going to need the ability to track segments on addresses, but honestly
> a lot of the finer details aren't clear yet. It's such a
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:51 AM Tom Stellard via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Is there anyone with access to a Mac OS system that has time to take a
> look at this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46190
>
When I've had compilation issues caused by CommandLineTools, the
Hi,
Is there anyone with access to a Mac OS system that has time to take a
look at this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46190
I had to disable the lldb post-commit test we have in the release/11.x
branch because of this bug and would like to get it enabled again.
Thanks,
Tom
