Hi Jonas, Davide,
I am not exactly thrilled by the ever-growing number of "modes" our test
suite can be run in. However, it seems that's a battle I am destined to
loose, so I'll just repeat what I've been saying for some time now.
I don't believe that either of these funny "modes" should be the _
> On Apr 6, 2020, at 2:24 PM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Reproducers in LLDB are currently tested through (1) unit tests, (2)
> dedicated end-to-end shell tests and (3) the `lldb-check-repro` suite which
> runs all the shell tests against a replayed reprodu
Hi everyone,
Reproducers in LLDB are currently tested through (1) unit tests, (2)
dedicated end-to-end shell tests and (3) the `lldb-check-repro` suite which
runs all the shell tests against a replayed reproducer. While this already
provides great coverage, we're still missing out on about 800 API
