Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-08-10 Thread Brian Cain via lldb-dev
[earlier I had accidentally sent this message to only Hans, re-sending as reply-all now] When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to build for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum required glibc? I think this test implementation previously use

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-08-03 Thread Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
On 30 Jul 2016, at 00:57, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > > 3.9.0-rc1 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r277207. After fixing two compiler-rt test failures (see r277297 and r277300) and one openmp test link failure (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D23084), I'm left with only two

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-08-02 Thread Ben Pope via lldb-dev
On 07/29/2016 11:57 PM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how it goes. I'll upload source, docs, and your binaries to the pre-release page once they're ready. Uploaded clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-08-02 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 2 August 2016 at 16:17, Hans Wennborg wrote: > Looks like Diana's fix was merged in r277462, so it sounds like we're all > good. Yup, we're good. Thanks! --renato ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-08-02 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 1 August 2016 at 17:37, Hans Wennborg wrote: >>> Is it time to do the back-ports planned? I only have a very minor bug fix. >> >> Sure! > > Backported the v6T2/DSP patch. Now just needs to get Diana's AArch64 > fix and we're fine. Looks li

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-08-02 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 1 August 2016 at 17:37, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> Is it time to do the back-ports planned? I only have a very minor bug fix. > > Sure! Backported the v6T2/DSP patch. Now just needs to get Diana's AArch64 fix and we're fine. cheers, --renato ___ lldb-d

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-08-02 Thread Bernhard Rosenkränzer via lldb-dev
Hi, On the OpenMandriva side, x86_64 passes all checks. We're having some problems with other architectures though (see below): x86_64 succeeded, packages are here: https://abf.openmandriva.org/build_lists/76792 i586 fails to build, but this seems to be an issue with 3.8.1 (which we're using to b

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-08-01 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 29 July 2016 at 23:57, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > wrote: >> There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the >> real testing started to see where we're at. > > First wave of testing pass on ARM. Uploaded to t

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged

2016-07-31 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 29 July 2016 at 23:57, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: > There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the > real testing started to see where we're at. First wave of testing pass on ARM. Uploaded to the FTP server. Is it time to do the back-ports planned? I only