This set of changes sounds good to me. Thanks!
-eric
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:00 PM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
> current process is documented here:
>
On 26 May 2020, at 18:24, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 05/21/2020 05:54 PM, John McCall wrote:
On 21 May 2020, at 14:59, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process.
The
current process is documented here:
On 05/21/2020 05:54 PM, John McCall wrote:
> On 21 May 2020, at 14:59, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
>> current process is documented here:
>> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html
>>
>> There are two
These changes and clarifications make sense to me.
On Thu, 21 May 2020, 12:00 Tom Stellard via llvm-dev, <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
> current process is documented here:
>
On 21 May 2020, at 14:59, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process.
The
current process is documented here:
https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html
There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a list of
All of this sounds reasonable to me, but we don't directly follow the
upstream release cadence so I'm an interested observer at most.
Philip
On 5/21/20 11:59 AM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The
current process is
