Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

I've merged r277997, r277999 and r278001 to 3.9 in r278540. Cheers, Hans On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > Hi, > > I do run a basic set of tests (compile+run test suite) on linux from > time to time, but unfortunately I don't have time to be more active in > this. I have jus

Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

Hi, I do run a basic set of tests (compile+run test suite) on linux from time to time, but unfortunately I don't have time to be more active in this. I have just completed the test on the release branch with these changes cherry-picked and it seems to working fine. But I certainly agree that the r

Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > On 10 August 2016 at 22:34, Dangling Pointer > wrote: >> Thanks Pavel! I see the changes made in master branch. >> >> >> By any change can these be back-ported to release38 and 39 branches? Since >> llvm38 is the one aports is offering. >> >

Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

On 10 August 2016 at 22:34, Dangling Pointer wrote: > Thanks Pavel! I see the changes made in master branch. > > > By any change can these be back-ported to release38 and 39 branches? Since > llvm38 is the one aports is offering. > I think the 3.8 ship has sailed, but there still may be a chance

Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc Hi, thanks for the patch. I took the opportunity to clean up the code there, so I have committed a somewhat modified version, but I believe you should get the result you were trying to achieve. Let me know how it works

Re: [lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

Hi, thanks for the patch. I took the opportunity to clean up the code there, so I have committed a somewhat modified version, but I believe you should get the result you were trying to achieve. Let me know how it works. cheers, pl On 2 August 2016 at 13:53, Dangling Pointer via lldb-dev wrote:

[lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

Hi, To build lldb 3.8 on Alpine Linux, this tiny patch is required: https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/blob/master/testing/lldb/lldb-3.8-alpine.patch Can anyone here please upstream it? Note that it doesn't break Android build as in case of both bionic and musl, __GLIBC__ macro is undefined