ugust, 2017 9:35 PM
To: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Symbolic information in disassembler output
Greg is right that this was a libedis feature and has no equivalent in LLDB
today.
MCInst, however, doesn't have enough information by itself to do this. The
reason is tha
Greg is right that this was a libedis feature and has no equivalent in
LLDB today.
MCInst, however, doesn't have enough information by itself to do this.
The reason is that for many things that are considered "operands," the
MCInst has several underlying operands. For example, an operand tha
I believe libedis was deprecated many years ago and hasn't returned. We use the
standard LLVM disassembler, so any features need to be built into llvm::MCInst.
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Tatyana Krasnukha via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As I understand it, old disassembler (based
I don't think anybody thought of it as useless. It's one of the things Jason
has been trying to find time to do for a while now.
InstructionLLVMC is the main concrete Instruction subclass in llvm now, and
relies on MCInst for most of the heavy lifting. So we should work with MCInst
to figure
Hello,
As I understand it, old disassembler (based on libedis) could print symbolic
information instead/beside address operand of an instruction. And it looks like
there is not such ability in disassembler now. Is this responsibility shifted
on some other component of lldb? Or it was considered
