Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 5:29 PM, Greg Clayton wrote: > > > >> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev >> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Pavel Labath >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 07/10/2020 21:01, Jim Ingham wr

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev > wrote: > > > >> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Pavel Labath wrote: >> >> On 07/10/2020 21:01, Jim Ingham wrote: On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Pavel Labath >>> > wrote: On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ing

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > On 07/10/2020 21:01, Jim Ingham wrote: >>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Pavel Labath >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev wrote: There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dime

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

On 07/10/2020 21:01, Jim Ingham wrote: On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Pavel Labath > wrote: On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev wrote: There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dimensional arrays of chars, but the type is matching the regex for the one-d

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev wrote: >> There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dimensional arrays of >> chars, but the type is matching the regex for the one-dimensional >> StringSummaryFormat, but that doesn’t ac

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

On 07/10/2020 20:42, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev wrote: There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dimensional arrays of chars, but the type is matching the regex for the one-dimensional StringSummaryFormat, but that doesn’t actually know how to format two dimensional arrays of chars.  The ty

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

There isn’t a built-in summary formatter for two dimensional arrays of chars, but the type is matching the regex for the one-dimensional StringSummaryFormat, but that doesn’t actually know how to format two dimensional arrays of chars. The type regex for StringSummaryFormat: char [[0-9]+] We

[lldb-dev] lldb 11.0.0-rc2 different behavior then gdb.

Hello all, While debugging and printing struct with multi-dimensional char array, gdb successfully prints string while lldb bails out with only printing address. For simple C testcase, struct b { char i[2][4]; }; int main() { struct b z; z.i[0][0] = 'F'; z.i[0][1