@@ -1070,6 +1072,30 @@ class PDLConversionConfig final {
#endif // MLIR_ENABLE_PDL_IN_PATTERNMATCH
+//===--===//
+// ConversionConfig
https://github.com/jpienaar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82250
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82250
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jpienaar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81761
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82731
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Fangrui Song (MaskRay)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82731.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+1)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
https://github.com/MaskRay created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82731
None
>From 9e42ddc522436a1129ba5a5e014035ca00262cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:57:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] ReleaseNotes: mention -mtls-dialect=desc
---
https://github.com/MaskRay milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82731
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx
Author: Tacet (AdvenamTacet)
Changes
This commit adds information that only long strings are annotated, and with all
allocators by default.
To read why short string annotations are not turned on yet, read comments in a
related PR:
https://github.com/AdvenamTacet created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82730
This commit adds information that only long strings are annotated, and with all
allocators by default.
To read why short string annotations are not turned on yet, read comments in a
related PR:
agozillon wrote:
a little ping for some reviewer attention if at all possible please to get some
forward momentum on the PR stack, thank you very much ahead of time!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81509
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
agozillon wrote:
a little ping for some reviewer attention if at all possible please to get some
forward momentum on the PR stack, thank you very much ahead of time!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81510
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
agozillon wrote:
Rebased on recent changes to the OpenMP lowering!
Plus a little ping for some reviewer attention if at all possible please to get
some forward momentum on the PR stack, thank you very much ahead of time!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81511
https://github.com/agozillon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81511
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/agozillon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81511
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/agozillon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81510
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/agozillon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81510
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/agozillon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81509
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/agozillon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81509
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tstellar wrote:
I'm OK with this kind of change if the AArch64 maintainers are on board.
@AaronBallman Do you have a strong objection to this PR?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81857
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
https://github.com/tstellar closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82688
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Thomas Preud'homme
Date: 2024-02-22T21:08:58Z
New Revision: b9029ed0053b93d94e0f133e6a44250f82bf0dc2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b9029ed0053b93d94e0f133e6a44250f82bf0dc2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b9029ed0053b93d94e0f133e6a44250f82bf0dc2.diff
brad0 wrote:
> LGTM since this helps at least FreeBSD. Does OpenBSD want to try llvm binary
> utilities?
We're slowly moving in that direction with sparing use of objcopy and readelf
in some places with a desire for more like ar, ranlib and strip.
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
LGTM since this helps at least FreeBSD. Does OpenBSD want to try llvm binary
utilities?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82718
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82713
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-binary-utilities
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 26d71d9ed56c4c23e6284dac7a9bdf603a5801f3
Requested by: @brad0
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82718.diff
10 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@emaste What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82718
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82718
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82718
Backport 26d71d9ed56c4c23e6284dac7a9bdf603a5801f3
Requested by: @brad0
>From 7b790b0ad947db820462799ac70722aa4a18a25f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:24:21 -0800
Subject:
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: $commit_id`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/8013240633
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
request](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare)
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: $commit_id`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/8013213107
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
request](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare)
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: $commit_id`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/8013198408
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
request](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare)
brad0 wrote:
> Does `/cherry-pick $commit_id` work? I think it's the preferred way to
> backport a commit.
I tried. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/82692
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82713
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing
MaskRay wrote:
Does `/cherry-pick $commit_id` work? I think it's the preferred way to backport
a commit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82713
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82693
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-binary-utilities
Author: Brad Smith (brad0)
Changes
When a section has the SHF_COMPRESSED flag, -p/-x dump the compressed
content by default. In GNU readelf, if --decompress/-z is specified,
-p/-x will dump the decompressed content. This patch
https://github.com/brad0 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82713
When a section has the SHF_COMPRESSED flag, -p/-x dump the compressed
content by default. In GNU readelf, if --decompress/-z is specified,
-p/-x will dump the decompressed content. This patch implements the
option.
https://github.com/brad0 milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82713
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-binary-utilities
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 26d71d9ed56c4c23e6284dac7a9bdf603a5801f3
Requested by: @brad0
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82693.diff
10 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@emaste What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82693
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82693
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82693
Backport 26d71d9ed56c4c23e6284dac7a9bdf603a5801f3
Requested by: @brad0
>From 6ab419cea064195460c56a9e38e05fc25b8dc8c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:24:21 -0800
Subject:
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82688
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 7f71fa909a10be182b82b9dfaf0fade6eb84796c
Requested by: @RoboTux
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82688.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@MaskRay What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82688
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82688
Backport 7f71fa909a10be182b82b9dfaf0fade6eb84796c
Requested by: @RoboTux
>From b9029ed0053b93d94e0f133e6a44250f82bf0dc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Preud'homme
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 21:01:05 +
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82688
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82683
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82683
>From af8afe08ee20a04b2ccb363cac66aa02cfaecd02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Mayer
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:37:06 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] update message
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: Florian Mayer (fmayer)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82683.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) compiler-rt/lib/scudo/standalone/combined.h (+34-10)
- (modified)
https://github.com/fmayer created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82683
None
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ptomsich wrote:
> > On a different note: the "+pauth" fix would be helpful in clang-18 as well,
> > given that it brings the definition of "-march=armv8.3-a" in sync with the
> > specification.
>
> OK, so sounds like the +pauth change is separate but included in this PR for
> convenience.
tstellar wrote:
> On a different note: the "+pauth" fix would be helpful in clang-18 as well,
> given that it brings the definition of "-march=armv8.3-a" in sync with the
> specification.
OK, so sounds like the +pauth change is separate but included in this PR for
convenience.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport b0edc1c45284586fdb12edd666f95d99f5f62b43
Requested by: @OMaghiarIMG
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82664.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@lukel97 What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82664
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82664
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82664
Backport b0edc1c45284586fdb12edd666f95d99f5f62b43
Requested by: @OMaghiarIMG
>From 5994086729d9c28d8ea4059871c39c022097dc6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luke Lau
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 01:49:19 +0800
paschalis-mpeis wrote:
The benefits of having`getFRemInstrCost` in my view are the below:
1. frem is a special case anyway:
It's an IR instruction that is not supported by all hw and targets have to
specialize.
Handling it in a dedicated switch case with a dedicated TTI function call,
clearly
alexey-bataev wrote:
> Changing `getArithmeticInstrCost` is just too dangerous. What if one opcode
> needs TLI for a different reason?
That should be fine, what's the dangerous in it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82488
___
paulwalker-arm wrote:
Changing `getArithmeticInstrCost` is just too dangerous. What if one opcode
needs TLI for a different reason? all of a sudden all existing callers are
entered into the contract (FREM is guaranteed to be transformed into a math
call) without ensuring that's actually the
alexey-bataev wrote:
> Personally I'm happy with keeping this nuance outside of TTI but if we really
> want this captured within TTI then I think it's time to break FREM into its
> own cost function (i.e. implement getFRemInstrCost. That way
> getArithmeticInstrCost can work as it does today
@@ -8362,9 +8362,12 @@ BoUpSLP::getEntryCost(const TreeEntry *E, ArrayRef VectorizedVals,
unsigned OpIdx = isa(VL0) ? 0 : 1;
TTI::OperandValueInfo Op1Info = getOperandInfo(E->getOperand(0));
TTI::OperandValueInfo Op2Info =
@@ -1031,6 +1032,22 @@ APInt llvm::possiblyDemandedEltsInMask(Value *Mask) {
return DemandedElts;
}
+InstructionCost
+llvm::getVecLibCallCost(const Instruction *I, const TargetTransformInfo *TTI,
+const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+
@@ -869,6 +870,18 @@ TargetTransformInfo::getOperandInfo(const Value *V) {
return {OpInfo, OpProps};
}
+InstructionCost TargetTransformInfo::getVecLibCallCost(
+const int OpCode, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind) {
+
https://github.com/paulwalker-arm commented:
I've review the patch from both side so most of the comment will be void if you
opt for the new TTI hook. That advantage of the TTI hook is that because it is
specific to FREM you can hardware things like numbers of operands, which should
@@ -410,6 +410,14 @@ bool maskIsAllOneOrUndef(Value *Mask);
/// for each lane which may be active.
APInt possiblyDemandedEltsInMask(Value *Mask);
+/// Returns the cost of a call when a target has a vector library function for
+/// the given \p VecTy, otherwise an invalid
@@ -1031,6 +1032,22 @@ APInt llvm::possiblyDemandedEltsInMask(Value *Mask) {
return DemandedElts;
}
+InstructionCost
+llvm::getVecLibCallCost(const Instruction *I, const TargetTransformInfo *TTI,
+const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+
https://github.com/paulwalker-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82488
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -869,6 +870,18 @@ TargetTransformInfo::getOperandInfo(const Value *V) {
return {OpInfo, OpProps};
}
+InstructionCost TargetTransformInfo::getVecLibCallCost(
+const int OpCode, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind) {
+
https://github.com/chapuni commented:
I know I still have a couple of arbitrary names.
They come from my prototype.
* `MCDCCoverageBuilder::cache` -- will be "NextIDs list"
* `MCDCCoverageBuilder ::ccc(Expr, IDs)` -- just updates `cache`.
I will try to dissolve them within a few days.
@@ -723,7 +737,15 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
if (I == CondIDs.end())
return -1;
else
- return I->second;
+ return I->second.ID;
+ }
+
+ void ccc(const Expr *CondExpr, mcdc::ConditionIDs IDs) {
+auto ID = getCondID(CondExpr);
+if (ID < 0)
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1979,6 +2069,9 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
// Track RHS True/False Decision.
const auto DecisionRHS = MCDCBuilder.back();
+MCDCBuilder.ccc(E->getLHS(), DecisionLHS);
+MCDCBuilder.ccc(E->getRHS(), DecisionRHS);
chapuni wrote:
I
@@ -869,6 +870,18 @@ TargetTransformInfo::getOperandInfo(const Value *V) {
return {OpInfo, OpProps};
}
+InstructionCost TargetTransformInfo::getVecLibCallCost(
+const int OpCode, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind) {
+
@@ -869,6 +870,18 @@ TargetTransformInfo::getOperandInfo(const Value *V) {
return {OpInfo, OpProps};
}
+InstructionCost TargetTransformInfo::getVecLibCallCost(
+const int OpCode, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind) {
+
@@ -869,6 +870,18 @@ TargetTransformInfo::getOperandInfo(const Value *V) {
return {OpInfo, OpProps};
}
+InstructionCost TargetTransformInfo::getVecLibCallCost(
+const int OpCode, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind) {
+
@@ -869,6 +870,18 @@ TargetTransformInfo::getOperandInfo(const Value *V) {
return {OpInfo, OpProps};
}
+InstructionCost TargetTransformInfo::getVecLibCallCost(
+const int OpCode, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind) {
+
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
* Consider that immediate escalating function can appear at global scope,
fixing a crash
* Lambda conversion to function pointer was sometimes not performed in an
immediate function context when it
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82609
* Consider that immediate escalating function can appear at global scope,
fixing a crash
* Lambda conversion to function pointer was sometimes not performed in an
immediate function context when it should be.
https://github.com/steakhal milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82609
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/matthias-springer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81761
>From 6d02f6d545fff81a41b7e40fa48f19c55483c77b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Springer
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 10:29:29 +
Subject: [PATCH] [WIP] UnresolvedMaterialization
BEGIN_PUBLIC
No
https://github.com/matthias-springer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81759
>From d15c439f166426a613ac0021a9101b774d544357 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Springer
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:21:48 +
Subject: [PATCH] [mlir][Transforms][NFC] Turn op creation into
@@ -2549,10 +2572,15 @@ LogicalResult
OperationConverter::legalizeConvertedArgumentTypes(
});
return liveUserIt == val.user_end() ? nullptr : *liveUserIt;
};
- for (auto : rewriterImpl.rewrites)
-if (auto *rewrite = dyn_cast(r.get()))
- if
@@ -8362,9 +8362,20 @@ BoUpSLP::getEntryCost(const TreeEntry *E, ArrayRef VectorizedVals,
unsigned OpIdx = isa(VL0) ? 0 : 1;
TTI::OperandValueInfo Op1Info = getOperandInfo(E->getOperand(0));
TTI::OperandValueInfo Op2Info =
ptomsich wrote:
On a different note: the "+pauth" fix would be helpful in clang-18 as well,
given that it brings the definition of "-march=armv8.3-a" in sync with the
specification.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81857
___
ptomsich wrote:
> > Is this fixing a regression introduced in Clang 18? I'm wondering why the
> > backport is needed in the first place, as this seems to be making
> > potentially significant changes during the RC ("Make +pauth enabled in
> > Armv8.3-a by default").
>
> It is adding new CPU
@@ -869,6 +870,18 @@ TargetTransformInfo::getOperandInfo(const Value *V) {
return {OpInfo, OpProps};
}
+InstructionCost TargetTransformInfo::getVecLibCallCost(
+const int OpCode, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind) {
+
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82488
>From 641aaf7c13d520bef52b092726f8346bfecb1c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paschalis Mpeis
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:53:00 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] SLP cannot vectorize frem calls in AArch64.
It
davemgreen wrote:
> Is this fixing a regression introduced in Clang 18? I'm wondering why the
> backport is needed in the first place, as this seems to be making potentially
> significant changes during the RC ("Make +pauth enabled in Armv8.3-a by
> default").
It is adding new CPU support to
89 matches
Mail list logo
