[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [DAGCombiner] In mergeTruncStore, make sure we aren't storing shifted in bits. (#90939) (PR #91038)

topperc wrote: @AtariDreams This bug has existed since at least LLVM 10. What makes it a candidate for backporting? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91038 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] release/18.x: [clang-format] Don't remove parentheses of fold expressions (#91045) (PR #91165)

https://github.com/rymiel approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91165 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] release/18.x: [clang-format] Don't remove parentheses of fold expressions (#91045) (PR #91165)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format Author: None (llvmbot) Changes Backport db0ed5533368 Requested by: @owenca --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91165.diff 2 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp (+6-1) - (modified)

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] release/18.x: [clang-format] Don't remove parentheses of fold expressions (#91045) (PR #91165)

https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91165 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [AMDGPU] Fix GFX12 encoding of s_wait_event export_ready (#89622) (PR #91034)

https://github.com/nikic milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91034 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] release/18.x: [clang-format] Don't remove parentheses of fold expressions (#91045) (PR #91165)

llvmbot wrote: @rymiel What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91165 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] release/18.x: [clang-format] Don't remove parentheses of fold expressions (#91045) (PR #91165)

https://github.com/llvmbot created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91165 Backport db0ed5533368 Requested by: @owenca >From 25c8774fdb84a439d7bc2d91bfe222b0f05c5453 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Owen Pan Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 21:33:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Don't

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [SelectionDAG] Mark frame index as "aliased" at argument copy elison (PR #91035)

https://github.com/nikic milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91035 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [DAGCombiner] In mergeTruncStore, make sure we aren't storing shifted in bits. (#90939) (PR #91038)

https://github.com/nikic milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91038 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [LV, LAA] Don't vectorize loops with load and store to invar address. (PR #91092)

https://github.com/nikic milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91092 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [workflows] Fix libclang-abi-tests to work with new version scheme (PR #91096)

https://github.com/nikic milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91096 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [AArch64][SelectionDAG] Mask for SUBS with multiple users cannot be elided (#90911) (PR #91151)

https://github.com/nikic milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91151 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][FP16] Do not create VBROADCAST_LOAD for f16 without AVX2 (#91125) (PR #91161)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 Author: None (llvmbot) Changes Backport f7bfb078cf037205a812dc4eece777130cfa88f5 Requested by: @phoebewang --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91161.diff 2 Files Affected: - (modified)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][FP16] Do not create VBROADCAST_LOAD for f16 without AVX2 (#91125) (PR #91161)

https://github.com/llvmbot created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91161 Backport f7bfb078cf037205a812dc4eece777130cfa88f5 Requested by: @phoebewang >From 71c46700938e77c29942f4fbe14cb3c4c41412cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Phoebe Wang Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 10:59:44 +0800

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][FP16] Do not create VBROADCAST_LOAD for f16 without AVX2 (#91125) (PR #91161)

llvmbot wrote: @RKSimon What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91161 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][FP16] Do not create VBROADCAST_LOAD for f16 without AVX2 (#91125) (PR #91161)

https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91161 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [AArch64][SelectionDAG] Mask for SUBS with multiple users cannot be elided (#90911) (PR #91151)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64 Author: AtariDreams (AtariDreams) Changes In DAGCombiner, the `performCONDCombine` function attempts to remove AND instructions in front of SUBS (cmp) instructions for which the AND is transparent. The rules for that are correct, but

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [AArch64][SelectionDAG] Mask for SUBS with multiple users cannot be elided (#90911) (PR #91151)

https://github.com/AtariDreams edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91151 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [AArch64][SelectionDAG] Mask for SUBS with multiple users cannot be elided (#90911) (PR #91151)

https://github.com/AtariDreams created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91151 In DAGCombiner, the `performCONDCombine` function attempts to remove AND instructions in front of SUBS (cmp) instructions for which the AND is transparent. The rules for that are correct, but it fails to

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [nfc][ThinLTO] Generate import status in per-module combined summary (PR #88024)

https://github.com/minglotus-6 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88024 >From cfb63d775d43a28b560d938346f1dd4b2dddc765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mingmingl Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 11:54:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/7] function import changes ---

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][EVEX512] Add `HasEVEX512` when `NoVLX` used for 512-bit patterns (#91106) (PR #91118)

https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request. LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91118 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [AArch64][GISEL] Consider fcmp true and fcmp false in cond code selection (#86972) (PR #91126)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64 @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-globalisel Author: None (llvmbot) Changes Backport c482fad2c1de367f8fef2b40361dec00523707f7 Requested by: @marcauberer --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91126.diff 3 Files Affected: -

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [AArch64][GISEL] Consider fcmp true and fcmp false in cond code selection (#86972) (PR #91126)

https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91126 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [AArch64][GISEL] Consider fcmp true and fcmp false in cond code selection (#86972) (PR #91126)

https://github.com/llvmbot created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91126 Backport c482fad2c1de367f8fef2b40361dec00523707f7 Requested by: @marcauberer >From aa3dd9a854c4da433c00d5b383ec1b98a7d3fe0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Auberer Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:08:38 +0100

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [AArch64][GISEL] Consider fcmp true and fcmp false in cond code selection (#86972) (PR #91126)

llvmbot wrote: @marcauberer What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91126 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][EVEX512] Add `HasEVEX512` when `NoVLX` used for 512-bit patterns (#91106) (PR #91118)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 Author: None (llvmbot) Changes Backport 7963d9a2b3c20561278a85b19e156e013231342c Requested by: @phoebewang --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91118.diff 3 Files Affected: - (modified)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][EVEX512] Add `HasEVEX512` when `NoVLX` used for 512-bit patterns (#91106) (PR #91118)

llvmbot wrote: @RKSimon What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91118 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][EVEX512] Add `HasEVEX512` when `NoVLX` used for 512-bit patterns (#91106) (PR #91118)

https://github.com/llvmbot created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91118 Backport 7963d9a2b3c20561278a85b19e156e013231342c Requested by: @phoebewang >From 8adb337ab73fc7c63e9e330a08f4525ddc84bcda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Phoebe Wang Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 18:40:27 +0800

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [X86][EVEX512] Add `HasEVEX512` when `NoVLX` used for 512-bit patterns (#91106) (PR #91118)

https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91118 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [InstCombine] Fix miscompile in negation of select (#89698) (PR #91089)

https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91089 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/18.x: [InstCombine] Fix miscompile in negation of select (#89698) (PR #91089)

nikic wrote: Declining backport: This is an ABI breaking change, and while it would be possible to rewrite the fix in a way that does not break ABI, I don't think the fix itself is important to backport (this is not a regression, the issue exists since at least LLVM 12).