@@ -613,9 +595,10 @@ define void @buildvector_v2f64_with_constant(ptr %dst,
double %a0) nounwind {
; CHECK-LABEL: buildvector_v2f64_with_constant:
; CHECK: # %bb.0: # %entry
; CHECK-NEXT:# kill: def $f0_64 killed $f0_64 def $vr0
-; CHECK-NEXT:vldi $vr1, -1024
-;
@@ -2495,26 +2492,47 @@ SDValue
LoongArchTargetLowering::lowerBUILD_VECTOR(SDValue Op,
if (DAG.isSplatValue(Op, /*AllowUndefs=*/false))
return Op;
- if (!isConstantBUILD_VECTOR(Node)) {
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumElts; ++i) {
+SDValue Opi = Node->getOperand(i);
Author: dyung
Date: 2025-07-25T19:59:08-07:00
New Revision: 5972f29670b2d45c35814267366d81390eea1dfb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5972f29670b2d45c35814267366d81390eea1dfb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5972f29670b2d45c35814267366d81390eea1dfb.diff
LOG: Re
@@ -0,0 +1,676 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=mipsel < %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=MIPSEL %s
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=mips < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=SOFT-FLOAT-32
+; RUN: llc -mtr
https://github.com/dsandersllvm approved this pull request.
I don't have a means to confirm this is correct anymore but this LGTM based on
my recollection and the function prototype
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148677
___
llvm-branch-comm
https://github.com/dsandersllvm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148677
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1055,74 +1059,122 @@ void MipsGotSection::build() {
ctx.symAux.back().gotIdx = p.second;
}
- // Create dynamic relocations.
+ // Create relocations.
+ //
+ // NB: GOT 'page address' entries have their VAs handled in writeTo as they
+ // reference an OutputSectio
jrtc27 wrote:
The current code is quite crusty and divergent from non-MIPS in API use, but
fixing it up like this is quite high-risk, especially given how weird the MIPS
GOT is when it comes to the required initial memory state. Is anyone using LLD
for MIPS these days who can test this in a wi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
Splitting the VA / addend calculations between build and writeTo means
having to keep them in sync and duplicating some of the logic. For
everything except "page address" relocations, move all such calculat
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
Splitting the VA / addend calculations between build and writeTo means
having to keep them in sync and duplicating some of the logic. For
everything except "page address" relocations, move all such calculations
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150730
Splitting the VA / addend calculations between build and writeTo means
having to keep them in sync and duplicating some of the logic. For
everything except "page address" relocations, move all such calculations
in
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628
>From 4a0016603595dd351dceeb7a5d38f9f7b6fdd88d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:21:34 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Fix not folding splat immediate into VGPR MFMA src2
---
arsenm wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148677
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150627
>From 4ee7be550e1afda175dedaaa79173ab6ad85a00a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:48:26 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Add a few mfma test with immediate splat src2
---
llvm
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628
>From 8ccb289cf870db110951a900ed3342ad97af24e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:21:34 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Fix not folding splat immediate into VGPR MFMA src2
---
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150627
>From 4ee7be550e1afda175dedaaa79173ab6ad85a00a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:48:26 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Add a few mfma test with immediate splat src2
---
llvm
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628
>From 8ccb289cf870db110951a900ed3342ad97af24e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:21:34 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Fix not folding splat immediate into VGPR MFMA src2
---
boomanaiden154 wrote:
@mysterymath In case you're unaware, the CI Checks workflow is failing/stuck
queuing because these PRs haven't been rebased in the past couple weeks. We
made some changes that require updates from the workflow definitions in `main`.
Normally these things get autopropagate
mstorsjo wrote:
I think this one should be closed; there's probably no more 20.x releases
planned now?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146699
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
@@ -126,6 +138,15 @@ static Object serializeComment(const CommentInfo &I,
Object &Description) {
auto TextCommentsArray = extractTextComments(CARef.front().getAsObject());
if (I.Name == "brief")
insertComment(Description, TextCommentsArray, "BriefComments");
+
@@ -126,6 +138,15 @@ static Object serializeComment(const CommentInfo &I,
Object &Description) {
auto TextCommentsArray = extractTextComments(CARef.front().getAsObject());
if (I.Name == "brief")
insertComment(Description, TextCommentsArray, "BriefComments");
+
vvereschaka wrote:
> @vvereschaka That issue only needs the change to the sort predicate, not this
> whole PR.
got it, @arsenm is it possible to create a separate PR to fix the test failure?
It could taka a lot of time for this PR to get merged. Thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
ilovepi wrote:
> It'd be nice to have a test for this but I'm not sure how to check for the
> existence of something after a LIT test is done.
Why not just another `RUN` line?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150656
___
llvm-branch-commits m
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150646
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
@vvereschaka That issue only needs the change to the sort predicate, not this
whole PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150192
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
Author: Mehdi Amini
Date: 2025-07-25T21:24:44+02:00
New Revision: 7a76c0f74365133035cd028fa25cf4c32db8a4a9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7a76c0f74365133035cd028fa25cf4c32db8a4a9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7a76c0f74365133035cd028fa25cf4c32db8a4a9.diff
L
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148073
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148073
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -295,6 +297,105 @@ getRootSignature(RootSignatureBindingInfo &RSBI,
return RootSigDesc;
}
+static void
+reportOverlappingRegisters(Module &M,
+ llvm::hlsl::rootsig::OverlappingRanges Overlap) {
+ const llvm::hlsl::rootsig::RangeInfo *Info = Over
Author: Han-Chung Wang
Date: 2025-07-25T11:26:37-07:00
New Revision: 410d9d069eeeb8a09f98a4b576b1d7d99db1b9b9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/410d9d069eeeb8a09f98a4b576b1d7d99db1b9b9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/410d9d069eeeb8a09f98a4b576b1d7d99db1b9b9.diff
vvereschaka wrote:
Sorry, wasn't clear. This PR should fix the broken `RuntimeLibcallEmitter.td`
test on the expensive check builders. The problem remains there for almost a
week and it would be good to fix it. Because of it i'm trying to understand
when this PR will be merged.
https://github
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150649
>From eb95d560a94f49531ad98389184036726494a016 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:10:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] add throws comments to comment template
Serialize thr
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150648
>From 2101340494a046e3472d7a6d2cf08b23416b84cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 12:49:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] precommit code comments
---
.../test/clang-doc/b
@@ -295,6 +297,105 @@ getRootSignature(RootSignatureBindingInfo &RSBI,
return RootSigDesc;
}
+static void
+reportOverlappingRegisters(Module &M,
+ llvm::hlsl::rootsig::OverlappingRanges Overlap) {
+ const llvm::hlsl::rootsig::RangeInfo *Info = Over
efriedma-quic wrote:
> ping
>
> (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/187/builds/8516)
Did you mean to put this comment somewhere else? This isn't merged.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150192
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150648
>From 7e9e93756afed954591f970a919f474639b327ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 12:49:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] precommit code comments
---
.../test/clang-doc/b
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
>From 6ca79fa19e505b36bc76a0bd2f062db1e0161b4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:25:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] precommit return comments test
---
.../clang-doc
vvereschaka wrote:
ping
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/187/builds/8516)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150192
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
https://github.com/evelez7 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150649
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ getClangDocContext(std::vector UserStylesheets =
{},
StringRef RepositoryUrl = "",
StringRef RepositoryLinePrefix = "", StringRef Base = "") {
ClangDocContext CDCtx{
- {}, "test-project", {}, {}, {}, RepositoryUr
@@ -481,9 +481,9 @@ ClangDocContext::ClangDocContext(tooling::ExecutionContext
*ECtx,
StringRef RepositoryUrl,
StringRef RepositoryLinePrefix, StringRef
Base,
std::vector UserSt
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150649
>From e736a45c736753ef6b2643bab71bcc818d49a368 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:10:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] add throws comments to comment template
Serialize thr
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2025-07-25T13:23:38-04:00
New Revision: a413ff23ce599eb42a537460c3e240dfd58b87fd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a413ff23ce599eb42a537460c3e240dfd58b87fd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a413ff23ce599eb42a537460c3e240dfd58b87fd.diff
https://github.com/evelez7 unassigned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150649
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 unassigned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150649
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ldionne wrote:
The rationale for cherry-picking this "feature" into the release is that we
want to gain experience with this and be able to ship a robust version of this
in the next release, non-experimentally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150481
__
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150481
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150649
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
evelez7 wrote:
It'd be nice to have a test for this but I'm not sure how to check for the
existence of something after a LIT test is done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150656
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Erick Velez (evelez7)
Changes
This new option defaults to delete the json dir after HTML generation.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150656.diff
6 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang
https://github.com/evelez7 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150656
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
evelez7 wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/150656?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/evelez7 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150656
This new option defaults to delete the json dir after HTML generation.
>From 640a774fcac11e11e4e8768ddfae0380d6e14b39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:51:32 -0700
Subject: [P
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150648
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150571
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/rampitec approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150588
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/rampitec approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150587
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150648
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150646
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150646
Backport 2d0ca09305fcece75e2c501f1ec74aa6eada69a0
Requested by: @dtcxzyw
>From 15fbe94cc3389b0fa8c820d06d83c42333b53631 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yingwei Zheng
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 00:23:56 +0800
Subjec
arsenm wrote:
I suspect this regressed in 36018494fdb9e92e0f61f6937e5ecd3a4472677f and just
didn't have tests, so perhaps this should go to the release branch
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150600
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
arsenm wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Jul 25, 4:01 PM UTC**: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull
request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/150628).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628
_
arsenm wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Jul 25, 4:01 PM UTC**: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull
request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/150627).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150627
_
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150627
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149197
>From 7c3030a3b6da3ef8a48acfe0031a7c2ed348499a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:50:26 +
Subject: [PATCH] feedback
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
.github/workflows
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149197
>From 7c3030a3b6da3ef8a48acfe0031a7c2ed348499a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aiden Grossman
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:50:26 +
Subject: [PATCH] feedback
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
.github/workflows
Author: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
Date: 2025-07-25T16:22:25+01:00
New Revision: 8d4fde51caeadb8696eecd2f8c50db0121379420
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d4fde51caeadb8696eecd2f8c50db0121379420
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d4fde51caeadb8696eecd2f8c50db01213794
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
---
Patch is 20.86 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.c
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150627
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150627.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/llvm.amdgcn.mfma.ll (+347)
``diff
diff --git a/llvm/test/C
arsenm wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/150627?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
arsenm wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/150628?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150628
None
>From 3c67b08d7533ed3977c5473aaebf0c281f3d7907 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:21:34 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Fix not folding splat immediate into VGPR MFMA src
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150627
None
>From ad766da7a00a2d270b80d74880b412817b2d1c23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 23:48:26 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Add a few mfma test with immediate splat src2
---
https://github.com/aaupov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150623
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Amir Ayupov (aaupov)
Changes
While registering profiled functions, only handle each address once.
Speeds up `DataAggregator::preprocessProfile`.
Test Plan:
For intermediate size pre-aggregated profile (10MB), reduces parsing
time from ~0.41
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Amir Ayupov (aaupov)
Changes
While registering profiled functions, only handle each address once.
Speeds up `DataAggregator::preprocessProfile`.
Test Plan:
For intermediate size pre-aggregated profile (10MB), reduces parsing
time from ~0.41
https://github.com/aaupov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150623
While registering profiled functions, only handle each address once.
Speeds up `DataAggregator::preprocessProfile`.
Test Plan:
For intermediate size pre-aggregated profile (10MB), reduces parsing
time from ~0.41s
https://github.com/aaupov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150622
While registering profiled functions, only handle each address once.
Speeds up `DataAggregator::preprocessProfile`.
Test Plan:
For intermediate size pre-aggregated profile (10MB), reduces parsing
time from ~0.41s
@@ -12,10 +12,135 @@
//===--===//
#include "AMDGPUMIRFormatter.h"
+#include "SIDefines.h"
#include "SIMachineFunctionInfo.h"
using namespace llvm;
+bool parseAtomicOrdering(StringRef Src, unsigned &Orde
@@ -12,10 +12,135 @@
//===--===//
#include "AMDGPUMIRFormatter.h"
+#include "SIDefines.h"
#include "SIMachineFunctionInfo.h"
using namespace llvm;
+bool parseAtomicOrdering(StringRef Src, unsigned &Orde
@@ -12,10 +12,135 @@
//===--===//
#include "AMDGPUMIRFormatter.h"
+#include "SIDefines.h"
#include "SIMachineFunctionInfo.h"
using namespace llvm;
+bool parseAtomicOrdering(StringRef Src, unsigned &Orde
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mir_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
arsenm wrote:
Mir print / parse belongs in test/CodeGen/MIR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150391
_
@@ -351,6 +351,31 @@ BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_endpgm, "v", "nr")
BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_get_fpenv, "WUi", "n")
BUILTIN(__builtin_amdgcn_set_fpenv, "vWUi", "n")
+//===--===//
+
+// Wave Reduction builtins.
+
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148013
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148013
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -370,6 +375,65 @@ PerfReaderBase::create(ProfiledBinary *Binary,
PerfInputFile &PerfInput,
return PerfReader;
}
+Error PerfReaderBase::parseDataAccessPerfTraces(
+StringRef DataAccessPerfTraceFile, std::optional PIDFilter) {
+ // A perf_record_sample line is like
+
@@ -370,6 +375,65 @@ PerfReaderBase::create(ProfiledBinary *Binary,
PerfInputFile &PerfInput,
return PerfReader;
}
+Error PerfReaderBase::parseDataAccessPerfTraces(
+StringRef DataAccessPerfTraceFile, std::optional PIDFilter) {
+ // A perf_record_sample line is like
+
@@ -1027,6 +1027,20 @@ class FunctionSamples {
return VirtualCallsiteTypeCounts[mapIRLocToProfileLoc(Loc)];
}
+ // At location \p Loc, add a type sample for the given \p Type with
paschalis-mpeis wrote:
nit: could use triple `///`.
https://github.com/
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis commented:
Nice work. Just adding a few nits.
> can you add a PIE variant test case too?
IIUC any PIE/PIC code is not yet supported, possibly due to the mapping done
below? 🤔
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/870d957970f19f29e143d0dd0ac2e325612b2188
https://github.com/paschalis-mpeis edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148013
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -6066,6 +6066,12 @@ bool AMDGPUAsmParser::ParseDirectiveAMDHSAKernel() {
ExprVal, ValRange);
if (Val)
ImpliedUserSGPRCount += 1;
+} else if (ID == ".amdhsa_uses_cu_stores") {
+ if (!isGFX1250())
arsenm wrote:
If
https://github.com/Pierre-vh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150588
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/arsenm commented:
It's a subtarget feature, not an option
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150588
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150488
>From faf7d914093c87804e9dbca349b1a2bca0aefd18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:56:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] updated test
Created using spr 1.3.4
---
bolt/test/X86/unclai
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
