jrtc27 wrote:
> > When DynamicReloc::Kind was introduced, I was concerned of the many Kinds,
> > but that was still better than the previous state. Thanks for the
> > simplification.
>
> Yeah I think Alex was a bit confused (and also there were some bugs that he
> faithfully replicated and si
jrtc27 wrote:
NB: This is a transient state, https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150812
removes this member. This makes the history a bit odd, but I think it makes it
clearer what's going on to include this in the history.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150799
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150730
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150730
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150730
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
DynamicReloc::AgainstSymbol is now true and DynamicReloc::AddendOnly is
now false; uses of the constants were replaced mechanically.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150813.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
DynamicReloc::AgainstSymbol is now true and DynamicReloc::AddendOnly is
now false; uses of the constants were replaced mechanically.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150813.diff
4 Fi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
Aside from Computed, Kind is now just AddendOnly and AgainstSymbol, so
it's really just a bool reflecting whether the resulting ELF relocation
should reference the symbol or not. Refactor DynamicReloc's storage
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
Aside from Computed, Kind is now just AddendOnly and AgainstSymbol, so
it's really just a bool reflecting whether the resulting ELF relocation
should reference the symbol or not. Refactor DynamicReloc's sto
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150729
>From 32400cb0d5c16e16b6d0d259955ba060f561fefe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jessica Clarke
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 02:12:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?U
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150729
>From 32400cb0d5c16e16b6d0d259955ba060f561fefe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jessica Clarke
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 02:12:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?U
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
This second constructor is just a shorthand for an AddendOnly relocation
against dummySym with R_ADDEND, so write it as such.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150811.diff
1 Files
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-mips
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
Instead of having a special DynamicReloc::Kind, we can just use a new
RelExpr for the calculation needed. The only odd thing we do that allows
this is to keep a representative symbol for the OutputSect
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
Instead of having a special DynamicReloc::Kind, we can just use a new
RelExpr for the calculation needed. The only odd thing we do that allows
this is to keep a representative symbol for the OutputSection i
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150813
DynamicReloc::AgainstSymbol is now true and DynamicReloc::AddendOnly is
now false; uses of the constants were replaced mechanically.
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing l
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150812
Aside from Computed, Kind is now just AddendOnly and AgainstSymbol, so
it's really just a bool reflecting whether the resulting ELF relocation
should reference the symbol or not. Refactor DynamicReloc's storage to
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150811
This second constructor is just a shorthand for an AddendOnly relocation
against dummySym with R_ADDEND, so write it as such.
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llv
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150810
Instead of having a special DynamicReloc::Kind, we can just use a new
RelExpr for the calculation needed. The only odd thing we do that allows
this is to keep a representative symbol for the OutputSection in
quest
pcc wrote:
> There are some discussions on a codegen patch #149444 that I did not follow.
> Could you summarize the motivation in this patch's description?
Sure. The motivation is the same as for #149448 which is an alternative to this
approach. I added it to the first paragraph of this PR's d
https://github.com/pcc edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150151
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
MaskRay wrote:
There are some discussions on a codegen patch #149444 that I did not follow.
Could you summarize the motivation in this patch's description?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150151
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-bran
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149026
>From 4c13a1eeaabed49fbbf0de7cf24677cbe8e09a00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:06:08 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Add a few missing mfma rewrite tests
Test other splitti
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149026
>From 4c13a1eeaabed49fbbf0de7cf24677cbe8e09a00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:06:08 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Add a few missing mfma rewrite tests
Test other splitti
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149027
>From b82fc9526af6f09cdfab8c4cbafa52a82f706e24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 12:57:13 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Handle rewriting non-tied MFMA to AGPR form
If src2 and
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149027
>From b82fc9526af6f09cdfab8c4cbafa52a82f706e24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 12:57:13 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Handle rewriting non-tied MFMA to AGPR form
If src2 and
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150566
>From 8a0bba305ae33515acd347395761ed8ddb82ea3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 10:23:31 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Handle rewriting VGPR MFMAs with immediate src2
This ca
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150566
>From 8a0bba305ae33515acd347395761ed8ddb82ea3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 10:23:31 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Handle rewriting VGPR MFMAs with immediate src2
This ca
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150730
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
jrtc27 wrote:
> > The current code is quite crusty and divergent from non-MIPS in API use,
> > but fixing it up like this is quite high-risk, especially given how weird
> > the MIPS GOT is when it comes to the required initial memory state. Is
> > anyone using LLD for MIPS these days who can t
jrtc27 wrote:
> When DynamicReloc::Kind was introduced, I was concerned of the many Kinds,
> but that was still better than the previous state. Thanks for the
> simplification.
Yeah I think Alex was a bit confused (and also there were some bugs that he
faithfully replicated and since fixed, o
MaskRay wrote:
> The current code is quite crusty and divergent from non-MIPS in API use, but
> fixing it up like this is quite high-risk, especially given how weird the
> MIPS GOT is when it comes to the required initial memory state. Is anyone
> using LLD for MIPS these days who can test thi
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
When DynamicReloc::Kind was introduced, I was concerned of the many Kinds, but
that was still better than the previous state. Thanks for the simplification.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150798
__
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-semantics
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz)
Changes
The OpenMPSectionConstruct corresponds to the `!$omp section` directive, but
there is nothing in the AST node that stores the directive information. Even
though the only possibility (at the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-openmp
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz)
Changes
The OpenMPSectionConstruct corresponds to the `!$omp section` directive, but
there is nothing in the AST node that stores the directive information. Even
though the only possibility (at the mo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz)
Changes
The OpenMPSectionConstruct corresponds to the `!$omp section` directive, but
there is nothing in the AST node that stores the directive information. Even
though the only possibility (at the
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-parser
Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz)
Changes
The OpenMPSectionConstruct corresponds to the `!$omp section` directive, but
there is nothing in the AST node that stores the directive information. Even
though the only possibility (at the mo
https://github.com/kparzysz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150804
The OpenMPSectionConstruct corresponds to the `!$omp section` directive, but
there is nothing in the AST node that stores the directive information. Even
though the only possibility (at the moment) is "section
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150730
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150730
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150729
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150729
>From 32400cb0d5c16e16b6d0d259955ba060f561fefe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jessica Clarke
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 02:12:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?U
https://github.com/jrtc27 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150729
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150798
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150798
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150798
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150797
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150797
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
Currently we set the kind to AddendOnly in computeRaw() in order to
catch cases where we're not treating the DynamicReloc as computed.
Specifically, computeAddend() will then assert that sym is nullptr, so
can
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
Currently we set the kind to AddendOnly in computeRaw() in order to
catch cases where we're not treating the DynamicReloc as computed.
Specifically, computeAddend() will then assert that sym is nullptr, so
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150799
Currently we set the kind to AddendOnly in computeRaw() in order to
catch cases where we're not treating the DynamicReloc as computed.
Specifically, computeAddend() will then assert that sym is nullptr, so
can cat
jrtc27 wrote:
#150798. Screwed up spr...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150795
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/jrtc27 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150795
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
The former is just a special case of the latter, ignoring the expr and
always just using the addend. If we use R_ADDEND as expr (which
previously had no effect, and so was misleadingly R_ABS not R_ADDEND in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
The former is just a special case of the latter, ignoring the expr and
always just using the addend, allowing (and enforcing) the sym is null.
If we just use dummySym then we don't need to maintain this as
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
The former is just a special case of the latter, ignoring the expr and
always just using the addend, allowing (and enforcing) the sym is null.
If we just use dummySym then we don't need to maintain this as a
se
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
Author: Jessica Clarke (jrtc27)
Changes
The former is just a special case of the latter, ignoring the expr and
always just using the addend. If we use R_ADDEND as expr (which
previously had no effect, and so was misleadingly R_ABS not R_ADDEND in
all
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150798
The former is just a special case of the latter, ignoring the expr and
always just using the addend. If we use R_ADDEND as expr (which
previously had no effect, and so was misleadingly R_ABS not R_ADDEND in
all bu
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150797
The former is just a special case of the latter, ignoring the expr and
always just using the addend, allowing (and enforcing) the sym is null.
If we just use dummySym then we don't need to maintain this as a
separ
https://github.com/jrtc27 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150795
The former is just a special case of the latter, ignoring the expr and
always just using the addend. If we use R_ADDEND as expr (which
previously had no effect, and so was misleadingly R_ABS not R_ADDEND in
all bu
https://github.com/brad0 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147133
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/brad0 milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147133
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
hpoussin wrote:
@brad0, it is what you expected?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147133
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/illwieckz created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150774
- Append the version number to the `llvm-config` executable name.
So `llvm-config` is installed as `llvm-config-20` and `llvm-config` is a
symlink to it, the same way `clang` is installed as `clang-20` and `c
https://github.com/Meinersbur approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150764
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2025-07-26T17:34:51+02:00
New Revision: fbee92502f784da3e1be8c56b9031ea52f2d8fc0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fbee92502f784da3e1be8c56b9031ea52f2d8fc0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fbee92502f784da3e1be8c56b9031ea52f2d8fc0.diff
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150746
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150746
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic requested changes to this pull request.
I don't think this should be backported.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150771
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cg
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150771
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: AZero13 (AZero13)
Changes
As per the new guidelines, I finished this with the intention of being admitted
into the 21.x release.
It was finished for a few weeks before it was merged, and I would like to
backport this. I apolgoize
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: AZero13 (AZero13)
Changes
As per the new guidelines, I finished this with the intention of being admitted
into the 21.x release.
It was finished for a few weeks before it was merged, and I would like t
https://github.com/AZero13 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150771
As per the new guidelines, I finished this with the intention of being admitted
into the 21.x release.
It was finished for a few weeks before it was merged, and I would like to
backport this. I apolgoize if th
https://github.com/llvmbot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150764
>From 96e15ebab5ae593cd5c8d84ce9d787d81f4b756d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Truby
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 14:42:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [flang-rt] Remove hard-coded dependency on compiler-rt path
on Wi
llvmbot wrote:
@Meinersbur What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150764
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150764
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150764
Backport c20a95a
Requested by: @DavidTruby
>From 69d0f9a23365c519279fc16dcf2c28cb5777e079 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Truby
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 14:42:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [flang-rt] Remove har
Author: OverMighty
Date: 2025-07-26T15:33:00+03:00
New Revision: c2996a126eed2d753ce5fe4da897f73bb1215a0d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c2996a126eed2d753ce5fe4da897f73bb1215a0d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c2996a126eed2d753ce5fe4da897f73bb1215a0d.diff
LO
Author: OverMighty
Date: 2025-07-26T15:29:21+03:00
New Revision: a1f25c4695c2b33fdcb7080644b836dc5010b8a8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a1f25c4695c2b33fdcb7080644b836dc5010b8a8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a1f25c4695c2b33fdcb7080644b836dc5010b8a8.diff
LO
https://github.com/tgross35 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150746
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Trevor Gross (tgross35)
Changes
Backport 7ed98a62fc4930b1f204541e326556af50d2249a and its two small follow-ups
68a401bd6532dd423ccf8509b72457dc35f787ca
2ba0bb66fa873259c5997271b0b971ef76bb
---
Patch is 491.08 KiB, truncated to
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150458
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
owenca wrote:
See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149602#pullrequestreview-3055128201.
Depending on when the public Google C++ style guide gets updated on this, we
might want to backport #149602 instead.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150458
__
https://github.com/owenca demilestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150458
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
83 matches
Mail list logo