ptomsich wrote:
> > On a different note: the "+pauth" fix would be helpful in clang-18 as well,
> > given that it brings the definition of "-march=armv8.3-a" in sync with the
> > specification.
>
> OK, so sounds like the +pauth change is separate but included in this PR for
> convenience.
ptomsich wrote:
On a different note: the "+pauth" fix would be helpful in clang-18 as well,
given that it brings the definition of "-march=armv8.3-a" in sync with the
specification.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81857
___
ptomsich wrote:
> > Is this fixing a regression introduced in Clang 18? I'm wondering why the
> > backport is needed in the first place, as this seems to be making
> > potentially significant changes during the RC ("Make +pauth enabled in
> > Armv8.3-a by default").
>
> It is adding new CPU
ptomsich wrote:
> This is a fairly big patch to backport. The ampere1b changes should be safe
> enough considering as it just adds support for an extra CPU. There is also
> the change from #78027 added for changing how PAUTH is enabled.
We can drop the dependency on #78027, if we modify the
https://github.com/ptomsich edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81857
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ptomsich edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81857
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ptomsich edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81857
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
