RalfJung wrote:
> So the problem Rust sees isn't that a ".1" was added to the version, but
> rather that the name was changed from "libLLVM-18-rust-1.78.0-nightly.so" to
> "libLLVM.so.18.1-rust-1.78.0-nightly". (that is: all the version info
> previously went into the library name which comes
RalfJung wrote:
Yeah, I linked to it: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121889.
I'm not a linker expert, but it seems that now symlinks are required to link
against the LLVM .so file, but we can't ship symlinks in our artifacts because
of Windows. The old approach we used of just shippi
RalfJung wrote:
Making such a fundamental change to the .so file so late in the release was
probably a bad idea... a bunch of downstream projects will have to adjust the
way they link with LLVM and that's [not always
easy](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121889).
https://github.com/l
