xry111 wrote:
I have some doubt about this change.
To me if the user requests `xvpermi.q` via the `loongarch_lasx_xvpermi_q`
intrinsic, we should give her/him the `xvpermi.q` instruction. If (s)he is
passing an invalid operand then (s)he is invoking the undefined behavior
herself/himself and
xry111 wrote:
> [wangleiat](https://github.com/wangleiat) wants to merge 1 commit into
> [users/wangleiat/spr/main.loongarchcodegen-add-support-for-tlsdesc-1](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/users/wangleiat/spr/main.loongarchcodegen-add-support-for-tlsdesc-1)
> from
> [users/wangleia
xry111 wrote:
> > > [wangleiat](https://github.com/wangleiat) wants to merge 1 commit into
> > > [users/wangleiat/spr/main.loongarchcodegen-add-support-for-tlsdesc-1](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/users/wangleiat/spr/main.loongarchcodegen-add-support-for-tlsdesc-1)
> > > from
> > >