https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111245
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106900
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
thanks a lot for doing this @HighCommander4!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105975
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
kadircet wrote:
i believe @tstellar should have that power :rocket:
Do you mind merging this into the branch, or advise on how we should do that
instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84436
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branc
@@ -51,21 +51,40 @@ Improvements to clangd
Inlay hints
^^^
+- Type hints
+* Improved heuristics for showing sugared vs. desguared types
+* Some hints which provide no information (e.g. ) are
now omitted
+- Parameter hints
+* Parameter hints are now sho
https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
thanks a lot for doing this @HighCommander4 !
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84436
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
https://github.com/kadircet edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84436
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
kadircet wrote:
Hi @mizvekov thanks for the fix, but I am not sure if this is at the right
level. The way you're bailing out currently prevents clangd from indexing all
implicit definitions, even if we have a hard-coded mapping for them (based on
the symbol name).
Also the map you're preventi